IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2025/12/20
@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+Irc2PGuest61619
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+hagen
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
Arch
Birdy
Daddy
Danny
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest20240
Irc2PGuest21366
Irc2PGuest32328
Irc2PGuest57061
Irc2PGuest62416
Irc2PGuest68429
Irc2PGuest7705
Irc2PGuest96466
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
Stormycloud_
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f_
acetone_
anontor
b3t4f4c3___
dr4wd3
duanin2
gellegery
leopold
makoto
n1
nilbog
not_bob_afk
nyaa2pguy
onon_
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
urist
user1
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
x74a6
zelgomer
zyx
orignal zzz, if I want to implement built-in torrent can I use name snark?
zzz snark was a clearnet torrent client that jrandom modified into i2psnark
zzz after the Lewis Carroll book 'The Hunting of the Snark', author of Alice in Wonderland
zzz 1876
orignal I meant I want to rewrite i2psnark to C++
orignal and call streams directly
zzz then you'd have to meet the licensing requirements for i2psnark
zzz you may find it easier to start from an existing c++ client, not sure
orignal why? if I want to rewrite it from scratch
orignal just the same protocol
zzz the i2p-specific parts of the code are small
orignal then whole idea that i2psnark communicates with streams rather than sockets
zzz our stream sockets look like standard sockets, more or less
orignal you know why people prefer snark vs. other i2p torrents?
zzz not sure they do
orignal they do
orignal because snark is only clinet where no possible leak to clearnet
orignal it works though i2p only
zzz jeff's XD too
orignal nobody uses it
orignal because it's dead
zzz not really
orignal I guess you send block of data to i2p dest through a stream without itremdiate socket
zzz it's an I2PSocket
zzz but yeah, direct, we don't go out-and-in to the JVM
orignal meaning what?
orignal that's what I need. direct communition with i2p
zzz meaning if a programmer knows java sockets, switching to I2PSockets isn't hard
orignal how? you need to use i2p addresses rather than I2P
zzz yeah but that's minor
orignal I don't see too much code in snark
zzz it's not too bad
orignal yes, would be easy to implemnet
orignal ofc, without web UI