@RN
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@T3s|4
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%ardu
%cumlord
%mareki2p
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Xeha
+f00b4r
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+wew
AHON1
Arch
BubbRubb
C341
Danny
DeltaOreo
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest24679
Irc2PGuest71839
Irc2PGuest84616
Liorar_
Meow
acetone_
carried6590
dr|z3d
halloy13412
maylay
moe_
not_bob_afk
pisslord
r00tobo[2]
shaye
shiver_
simprelay
snex
solidx66
thetia
u5657
weko_
zer0bitz
dr|z3d
zzz: I think the estimated total floodfills on the LS debug page might be slightly off? not entirely sure about the estimayed total leasesets, either.
dr|z3d
Estimated total floodfills: 1140939 (?!)
f00b4r
Rationale for bep_0051 is that DHT indexing is possible, but requires either a lot of unique IP addresses, or polluting routing tables of other nodes. Polluting tables is impossible, because I2P DHT has "Secure Node ID Requirement", but since I2P addresses are basically just cryptographic keys, anyone can create a lot of unique addresses. Moreover, to be capable to create more
f00b4r
identities on a singe machine, one can (and is incentivized to) disable transit traffic and reduce number of hops, which is bad for the network. Two possible solutions I see are either to make DHT indexing extremely difficult or remarkably simple.
f00b4r
Reasons I prefer the last approach are:
f00b4r
1. DHT searches would reduce reliance on trackers for locating content
f00b4r
2. They would also lead to a build-up of larger swarms, increasing availability and download speed
f00b4r
3. Private filesharing in I2P is already possible and simple enough
f00b4r
cc: zzz, dr|z3d
dr|z3d
I think we had a discussion about DHT searches a while ago, don't remember the exact details, but it's not a bad idea in principle, if you exclude all the potentially nasty content out there.
f00b4r
I think, it's not possible to filter content in decentralized manner on KRPC level. IMO, that should be solved by a search engine moderator
dr|z3d
I was thinking more inline search in I2PSnark.
f00b4r
In theory we can include hashes of nasty infohashes and/or regexps for filtering in snark
dr|z3d
yeah, sure, and just as easily someone can compile snark without them, which is fundamentally the issue. discovery. some stuff doesn't want to be discovered.
f00b4r
I'm not sure if I understand the issue correctly. Isn't the whole point of i2p censorship resistance?
f00b4r
I mean, even now one can create a tracker with nasty content and other one can load it using snark
dr|z3d
it's a bit more nuanced than censorship resistance.
dr|z3d
but let's be clear. Tor has a reputation for hosting the kind of content we'd rather not have here. sure, it's about, but we'd rather not make it easier to find than it already is.
dr|z3d
it's a similar discussion to the one we're having about destination blacklists. maybe the two have some crossover.
f00b4r
Where can I find those discussions?
dr|z3d
they're sporadic, they happen here, mostly, though there may be archives on major.i2p
f00b4r
Okay, thank you
dr|z3d
don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a btdigg type service exclusively for i2p content.
dr|z3d
it's just something that has to be "navigated" with care and some sort of oversight.
f00b4r
I guess, if we won't intentionally complicate participation in DHT, such services are still possible
zzz
re BEP 51, I'm Swiss, clients can implement or not, perhaps bigly already does or in a plugin, there's no protocol issues or i2p-specific changes req'd
dr|z3d
Latest + dev build has improved leaseset presentation and auto-refresh of the presented information every 15s, if you're running dev builds.
dr|z3d
Make sure you have js enabled in your console.
dr|z3d
"Interesting" LS: 2HIpbxtNRIzU~0HqhqgSMMmvg58StkYp3uA3T04un2k=
dr|z3d
In java, we can only host a single lease for 0 hop, are you doing something different in i2pd, orignal?
zzz
lol
Leopold
not_bob_afk: Is your resource notbob.i2p down?
RN
notbob.i2p is up
RN
did you try at least three times Leopold?
Leopold
reg.i2p says that notbob.i2p was last seen (UTC) on 2025-07-23 15:06:14
not_bob_afk
Odd, it should be up.
not_bob_afk
WTF?
Stormycloud
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh its broken
Stormycloud
Im tellin on you
not_bob
I see people hitting it in the logs.
not_bob
I did restart the service on teh main router. ABout to restart the others.
not_bob
This may be a larger issue.
not_bob
But, not a me specific one.
not_bob
But, yep. Watching the logs. A shit ton of requests for hosts.txt, as is usual.
not_bob
*** shakes his head ***
not_bob
I will let it rest for a bit and look at it in an hour.
not_bob_afk
Thank you for letting me know.
zzz
got my new peepers, expect 500 checkins soon ))))
dr|z3d
\o/