IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#saltr
/2024/10/21
~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens
+Irc2PGuest89555
+Leopold
+Xeha
+acetone
+cancername
+cumlord
+poriori
+profetikla
+snex
+uop23ip
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
DiCEy1904
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest80090
Irc2PGuest88718
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4
anon
anu3
bak83_
boonst
hk
itsjustme
khb
mareki2pb
not_bob_afk
onon_1
shiver_
snow
solidx66
thetia
u5657
weko_
z0a1
orignal new arrack?
orignal *attack
dr|z3d definitely a bump in transit requests.
orignal and traffic
orignal now I know what's going on with 2RRY
orignal sudden spike that reached 80Mbs cap instantly
orignal it becomes E
orignal and then I see low transit just because it became E before
dr|z3d traffic is increased, but from where I'm sitting it doesn't look too bad right now.
orignal it's not increasing
orignal it produces spikes
dr|z3d yeah, you're right, very spiky.
dr|z3d appears to have started around 9AM UTC.
orignal Vort sees the same
dr|z3d I'm sure it's network-wide, looking at my routers.
dr|z3d on the plus side, your moaners complaining about lack of traffic will have less to moan about.
dr|z3d you've got the perfect conditions to test a per-router transit throttle now, orignal.
orignal do you know if it comes from signle tunnel or from few?
dr|z3d looks like the requests are spread out. not seeing any obvious signs of a single router doing all the requests.
dr|z3d Chinese routers are up there making plenty of requests.
dr|z3d also a ton of routers not publishing a version.
orignal can you also check the log for "tunnel injection" messages?
dr|z3d I don't think I'm seeing anything like that right now.
orignal thanks
dr|z3d I think we flag them as possible replay attacks.
dr|z3d so on one of my routers right now, China is #1 for X tier routers.
orignal whci version?
dr|z3d they're all on 0.9.58
orignal tunnel injection is not a replay attach
dr|z3d either way, not seeing any evidence.
orignal so it seems old attack
dr|z3d at this point it's not looking particularly concerning. more traffic, more transit tunnels.. gives the network a workout.
dr|z3d orignal: reddit's also reporting "huge traffic" -> teddit.i2p/r/i2p
orignal Transit: 165.89 GiB (6261.79 KiB/s)
orignal at 2RRY
orignal see how low overall traffic and how hight at the moment
dr|z3d I don't get the sense the reddit users reporting huge traffic are celebrating.
dr|z3d and it's huge traffic on i2pd.
orignal I don't underdtand either
dr|z3d have you got a method to count the number of transit tunnels per peer?
uop23ip Those heavy bw routers on reddit have all very low tunnel build success rates
orignal no. but it can be done
orignal 23% at 2RRY
orignal not bad
dr|z3d it might be a good idea to stat that, so you can see better what you're dealing with.
orignal you know I always wanted to bind transoprt to tunnel directly to avoid extra lookup
dr|z3d + routers around 70-80% build success. no major hit.
Irc2PGuest89555 is postman down?
not_bob Irc2PGuest89555: Works fine for me.
Irc2PGuest89555 not_bob_afk: hmm, concerning
Irc2PGuest89555 I haven't been able to access postman for several hours
Irc2PGuest89555 assumed it was down
StormyCloud postman tracker loads for me
eyedeekay I'm sitting around 70 here all morning, firewalled routers saw nothing at all but my floodfills saw the bw spike
RN mesh, did you try three times?
RTP I am seeing "postman under heavy load" on first test attempt
RTP then loads fine on proceed button
StormyCloud same, yall downloading too many of those linux iso's
RN just take a beat in between clicking things on tracker2
RN the rate limits are a little tight, but not too bad
RN Linux ISO's are like pokemon
RN gotta catch 'em all
T3s|4 RTP: I've yet to NOT be greeted by the Postman entry Sumo in many months ;p
RN Sumo is probably here to stay till people stop hitting his site with automation
orignal lol. 2RRY is dead now becuase the issue at hoster's side ))
orignal we need another tracker
RN even your ISP is out to get you?
RN ))
orignal no. they were always crap
orignal I suspect 2RRY is not only I2P node hosted there
orignal and they can't handle today's spike
orignal thier site says "502 Bad Gateway"
RN huh!
RN eepgit says "** I2P addresses unsupported
RN ummm... isn't that what it is for?
RN s/eepgit/eepget/
dr|z3d make sure you have a prefix
RN yeah, it didn't like https, and http is timeing out
RN Blinded message
dr|z3d lose the :port
RN trying that
RN timeout
RN and fail in firefox
RN trus has never worked for me
RN does that link (with port and https) work in your browser?
dr|z3d no idea, not trying it.
RN file is just a FOIA list of flight passengers
RN but, why does eepget have an error string that says it doesn't support I2P addresses?!?
RN never saw that error message before, but it definitely does not make sense.
dr|z3d you've got your local git repo, grep for the string.
dr|z3d git grep "I2P addresses unsupported"
RN sure, if I wanted to change it in the code for mine... but... a tool for downloading I2P stuff, that message doesn't make sense. it is built for I2P.
dr|z3d no, if you want to identify the conditions where it's displayed.
RN not in frame of mind for code... and I know this is 'upstream' for you... but it just doens't make sense worded that way
dr|z3d what can I say? file a bug report :)
dr|z3d > throw new MalformedURLException("I2P addresses unsupported");
dr|z3d it appears the error is genuine.
dr|z3d it's telling you that eepget doesn't support
dr|z3d Is it clear? Probably not. Definitely scope for improvement.