~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@not_bob
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
+FreefallHeavens_
+Leopold
+Xeha
+acetone
+bak83
+cumlord
+hk
+profetikla
+r00tobo_BNC
+uop23ip
+weko
An0nm0n
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest12335
Irc2PGuest33075
Irc2PGuest53061
Irc2PGuest55294
Irc2PGuest5871
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
anon
anu3
boonst
carried6590
khb
mareki2pb
onon_1
poriori_
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
orignal
new arrack?
orignal
*attack
dr|z3d
definitely a bump in transit requests.
orignal
and traffic
orignal
now I know what's going on with 2RRY
orignal
sudden spike that reached 80Mbs cap instantly
orignal
it becomes E
orignal
and then I see low transit just because it became E before
dr|z3d
traffic is increased, but from where I'm sitting it doesn't look too bad right now.
orignal
it's not increasing
orignal
it produces spikes
dr|z3d
yeah, you're right, very spiky.
dr|z3d
appears to have started around 9AM UTC.
orignal
Vort sees the same
dr|z3d
I'm sure it's network-wide, looking at my routers.
dr|z3d
on the plus side, your moaners complaining about lack of traffic will have less to moan about.
dr|z3d
you've got the perfect conditions to test a per-router transit throttle now, orignal.
orignal
do you know if it comes from signle tunnel or from few?
dr|z3d
looks like the requests are spread out. not seeing any obvious signs of a single router doing all the requests.
dr|z3d
Chinese routers are up there making plenty of requests.
dr|z3d
also a ton of routers not publishing a version.
orignal
can you also check the log for "tunnel injection" messages?
dr|z3d
I don't think I'm seeing anything like that right now.
orignal
thanks
dr|z3d
I think we flag them as possible replay attacks.
dr|z3d
so on one of my routers right now, China is #1 for X tier routers.
orignal
whci version?
dr|z3d
they're all on 0.9.58
orignal
tunnel injection is not a replay attach
dr|z3d
ok
dr|z3d
either way, not seeing any evidence.
orignal
so it seems old attack
dr|z3d
at this point it's not looking particularly concerning. more traffic, more transit tunnels.. gives the network a workout.
dr|z3d
orignal: reddit's also reporting "huge traffic" -> teddit.i2p/r/i2p
orignal
Transit: 165.89 GiB (6261.79 KiB/s)
orignal
at 2RRY
orignal
see how low overall traffic and how hight at the moment
dr|z3d
I don't get the sense the reddit users reporting huge traffic are celebrating.
dr|z3d
and it's huge traffic on i2pd.
orignal
I don't underdtand either
dr|z3d
have you got a method to count the number of transit tunnels per peer?
uop23ip
Those heavy bw routers on reddit have all very low tunnel build success rates
orignal
no. but it can be done
orignal
23% at 2RRY
orignal
not bad
dr|z3d
it might be a good idea to stat that, so you can see better what you're dealing with.
orignal
you know I always wanted to bind transoprt to tunnel directly to avoid extra lookup
dr|z3d
+ routers around 70-80% build success. no major hit.
Irc2PGuest89555
is postman down?
not_bob
Irc2PGuest89555: Works fine for me.
Irc2PGuest89555
not_bob_afk: hmm, concerning
Irc2PGuest89555
I haven't been able to access postman for several hours
Irc2PGuest89555
assumed it was down
StormyCloud
postman tracker loads for me
eyedeekay
I'm sitting around 70 here all morning, firewalled routers saw nothing at all but my floodfills saw the bw spike
RN
mesh, did you try three times?
RTP
I am seeing "postman under heavy load" on first test attempt
RTP
then loads fine on proceed button
StormyCloud
same, yall downloading too many of those linux iso's
RN
just take a beat in between clicking things on tracker2
RN
the rate limits are a little tight, but not too bad
RN
Linux ISO's are like pokemon
RN
gotta catch 'em all
T3s|4
RTP: I've yet to NOT be greeted by the Postman entry Sumo in many months ;p
RN
Sumo is probably here to stay till people stop hitting his site with automation
orignal
lol. 2RRY is dead now becuase the issue at hoster's side ))
orignal
we need another tracker
RN
even your ISP is out to get you?
RN
))
orignal
no. they were always crap
orignal
I suspect 2RRY is not only I2P node hosted there
orignal
and they can't handle today's spike
orignal
thier site says "502 Bad Gateway"
orignal
lol
RN
huh!
RN
eepgit says "** I2P addresses unsupported
RN
"
RN
ummm... isn't that what it is for?
RN
s/eepgit/eepget/
dr|z3d
make sure you have a prefix
RN
yeah, it didn't like https, and http is timeing out
RN
Blinded message
dr|z3d
lose the :port
RN
trying that
RN
timeout
RN
and fail in firefox
RN
trus has never worked for me
RN
does that link (with port and https) work in your browser?
dr|z3d
no idea, not trying it.
RN
file is just a FOIA list of flight passengers
RN
but, why does eepget have an error string that says it doesn't support I2P addresses?!?
RN
never saw that error message before, but it definitely does not make sense.
dr|z3d
you've got your local git repo, grep for the string.
dr|z3d
git grep "I2P addresses unsupported"
RN
sure, if I wanted to change it in the code for mine... but... a tool for downloading I2P stuff, that message doesn't make sense. it is built for I2P.
dr|z3d
no, if you want to identify the conditions where it's displayed.
RN
not in frame of mind for code... and I know this is 'upstream' for you... but it just doens't make sense worded that way
dr|z3d
what can I say? file a bug report :)
dr|z3d
> throw new MalformedURLException("I2P addresses unsupported");
dr|z3d
it appears the error is genuine.
dr|z3d
it's telling you that eepget doesn't support
dr|z3d
Is it clear? Probably not. Definitely scope for improvement.