&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN_
+T3s|4
+eche|off
+nilbog
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+sourceress
Arch
Birdy
Danny
Irc2PGuest30010
Irc2PGuest36077
Irc2PGuest49364
Irc2PGuest51117
Irc2PGuest6564
Irc2PGuest65656
Irc2PGuest67278
Irc2PGuest74235
Irc2PGuest83482
Irc2PGuest99117
MatrixBot
Onn4l7h
Over
Sleepy
Teeed
Yotsu
__bob_
aargh3
ac9f
acetone_
ahiru
anontor
b3t4f4c3__
cims
dr4wd3_
dr|z3d
duanin2
hababam
hagen_
leopold
makoto
marek
marek22k
noidea
not_bob_afk2
nyaa2pguy
o3d3_
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
solidx66
stormycloud[m]
test7363673
uop23ip
urist_
user_
zelgomer
orignal
zzz, small question about SAM
orignal
when a command session gets diconnected and reconnects back immeditely you assign old session, right?
orignal
my question is for how long do you keep a session after diconnect
zzz
orignal, session is torn down immediately, there is no "grace period"
orignal
why?
orignal
so user has a wifi glitch and have to create session/destination from scratch?
orignal
it seems wrong
orignal
what do you think if I try to implement this?
orignal
to improve stability
zzz
sounds like more trouble than it's worth
orignal
what kind of troubles?
orignal
if you reconnect quickly during grace period
zzz
sounds to me like it would be complex to implement, saving all the state
zzz
would individual sockets stay up? how do you know it's the same endpoint? doesn't sound fun
zzz
to me anyway
orignal
I don't need to know same endoint I only need to know session id
orignal
if I see SESSION CREATE with existing session id during grace period I don't decline but assign onld one
zzz
doesn't sound great to me, but it's up to you
orignal
how about dest?
orignal
not session
orignal
e.g. session dies right a way while assiciate dest doesn't
zzz
we tear it all down immediately
orignal
that's really wrong
orignal
you have to recreate tunnels again
orignal
immediately
zzz
it's a corner case not worth worrying about imho. fine if you want to