&eche|on
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest16752
Irc2PGuest33667
Irc2PGuest51880
Irc2PGuest97218
Onn4l7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f_
b3t4f4c3__
b4dab00m
bak83_
duanin2
duck
john231
makoto
nilbog-
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
vivid_reader56
x74a6
xHarr
orignal
zzz, what do you think about SSU2 address cap mentioning symmetric NAT?
orignal
it would help to build U-U-U tunnels
zzz
orignal, discussed April 11; awaiting proposal
orignal
and what did we agree?
zzz
don't know if we did, but read the backlog
orignal
I suspect I lost it
zzz
its been on my list for 6 months stats.i2p/docs/roadmap-2.8-zzz.html
orignal
I reeber it was only an idea without any discussion
zzz
then read major
orignal
sec
orignal
I remeber it was discussion about symemtric NAT
orignal
than two U routers can't connect each others if both are behind symmetric NAT
orignal
but don't reeber discussion about caps
orignal
"Published G cap if symmetric natted, in 2.5.2"
orignal
You do it now?
zzz
yes, as stated
orignal
hwo come I hear it for the first time? ))
orignal
what is "moddle hop cap"?
orignal
oh yes I remeber what's that
orignal
but should be called "only middle hop cap"
orignal
for routers with limited connectivity
orignal
btw setting G for symmetric NAT is not the best idea
orignal
because it might be first hop
zzz
I believe that's what I said I would do, but I don't remember specifically.
zzz
check the backlog
zzz
it may have been temporary until you wrote a proposal?
orignal
did you have a chance to look at relay reponse resends?
orignal
maybe
zzz
what about relay resposne?
orignal
1. they are no akced
orignal
does Bob forward resend from chahlie to alice?
orignal
looks like your charlie resends hole punch and relay response together
zzz
I assumed that your fix solved all the problems. I'll put it on my list, will take a while
orignal
no
orignal
we have an issue with introducers
orignal
Chralie received relay intro
orignal
sends relay response
orignal
never gets Ack back
orignal
and believe that this session is dead
orignal
as reasult we don't resend relay reponse from charlie now
zzz
ok, I'll put it on the list
orignal
because sessions die
orignal
for 6 relay reponses what data do you need from em?
zzz
I'll research and get back to you
orignal
thanks
zzz
so far I only see retx as charlie when bob is i2pd 0.9.63
zzz
10/26 10:15:46.733 INFO [ handler 1/1] nsport.udp.IntroductionManager: Send relay response 0 as charlie nonce xxx to bob 185.82.217.48:14412 q-8YF0 OB2
zzz
10/26 10:15:46.956 INFO [ handler 1/1] nsport.udp.IntroductionManager: Send relay response 68 as charlie nonce xxx to bob 185.82.217.48:14412 q-8YF0 OB2
zzz
10/26 10:15:47.420 INFO [ handler 1/1] nsport.udp.IntroductionManager: Send relay response 68 as charlie nonce xxx to bob 185.82.217.48:14412 q-8YF0 OB2
zzz
10/26 10:15:48.129 INFO [ handler 1/1] nsport.udp.IntroductionManager: Send relay response 68 as charlie nonce xxx to bob 185.82.217.48:14412 q-8YF0 OB2
zzz
note that first time is 0, the rest are 68 (because the relay was successful and we connected to alice)
zzz
and I am sending acks
zzz
actually sending twice, because I send the relay response, which includes the ack, and a separate ack shortly after, so I can remove the 2nd one
orignal
that's fine because Bob didn't send ack in previous releases
orignal
but I'm asking about Alice
orignal
so, you are Charlie sending relay reponse and keep resending because bob don't ack
orignal
?
orignal
yes, it's known issue and it's fixed
orignal
the problem I see when you are Bob and I'm Alice and keep receiving RelayResponses even if I send Ack
zzz
no, as charlie I keep getting relay intros from bob
orignal
but from older versions
zzz
when i2pd 0.9.63 is bob
zzz
yes
orignal
wait
zzz
so you think I have a bug as alice or bob or charlie? I'm confused again
orignal
you don't get acks to you relay reponses or you get resends of relay intro?
orignal
as bob
orignal
bob keeps sending relay responses to alice even if they are acked
zzz
I'm testing as charlie right now, and not seeing anything wrong
zzz
I get resends of relay intro from bob, as charlie, if bob is i2pd 0.9.63
zzz
I can switch and test as bob later
orignal
do you get acks to relay reponses from Java Bob?
orignal
sorry acks to relay reposnses
zzz
yes
zzz
I'm going to test this minor tweak for charlie, then test bob later
zzz
eyedeekay, you said bundle is done but not on website, nor is 2.6.1. still on 2.6.0. 2.6.1 blog is still drafted, no 2.7.0 blog in sight. Is your release process broken?
orignal
thanks. will test again
eyedeekay
Necessary changed to i2p.www were pushed to the wrong remote, download page has been corrected as has that part of the release process. Blog still pending.
zzz
thanks eyedeekay