@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+orignal
+postman
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest16752
Irc2PGuest33667
Irc2PGuest33976
Irc2PGuest51880
Irc2PGuest97218
Onn4l7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy_
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f_
b3t4f4c3__
b4dab00m
bak83_
duanin2_
eyedeekay_
john231
leopold
makoto
nilbog-
not_bob_afk
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
x74a6
xHarr
orignal
zzz, where is SRV recrord located?
zzz
the proposal is that it goes in the (currently unused) options mappping in LS2
orignal
what if an LS has multiple domain names?
orignal
secpnd. what will prevent me to use someone elese's domain?
orignal
only FFs cache?
zzz
generally, our addressbook / subscriptions do not support mulitple domain names for one destination
zzz
there's nothing to prevent you from forwarding your email to somebody else
zzz
FFs don't care about it, no cache in FFs. Only routers that look it up would cache
orignal
in reg.i2p you can register mamy domains for one destonation
dr|z3d
multiple domains for a single dest isn't prevented either. there's no correlation between domains in the addressbook, but there's plenty of domains being hosted from a single dest.
zzz
ok, this proposal would have the service records apply to all domains
zzz
would you need them to be different for e.g. foo.example.i2p and bar.example.i2p pointing to different mail servers?
dr|z3d
gut instinct tells me you'd want to limit to the primary domain.
dr|z3d
so foo.eg.i2p and bar.eg.i2p both direct to eg.i2p
orignal
wait? is this propopsal for e-mail only?
orignal
or addressbook in genreal?
zzz
the proposal is for any service type; the most obvious first application would be email
orignal
wait
orignal
e-mail is more complicated
orignal
because MX record
zzz
not really. SRV record is just a generic version of a MX record
zzz
there's no need to do MX if we do SRV
orignal
how about A?
zzz
a LS is kinda like an A record, it give you the gateway addresses
zzz
so that's why an LS is a little bit like DNS
zzz
if you think of it that way, then SRV records make sense
orignal
please exaplin on example
orignal
I publish some LS with SRV = zzz.i2p?
orignal
what's goin to happen?
zzz
if I want the email for anybody@zzz.i2p to be sent to a server bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.b32.i2p port 25:
zzz
In the options for the zzz.i2p LS, I would put:
zzz
_smtp._tcp="1 86400 0 0 25 bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.b32.i2p"
orignal
and hot it works?
zzz
If I wanted to send email to anybody@zzz.i2p, I would get the zzz.i2p leaseset, and look for the SRV "_smtp_tcp" in the options
orignal
I resolve zzz.i2p though regular addressbook
zzz
[end of example]
orignal
do leaseset lookup
orignal
then obtain this SRV record
orignal
and use that address as MX servers?
zzz
correct
orignal
it's clear now
zzz
or maybe you look up _smtp._tcp.zzz.i2p in the address book, and it "knows" that if it starts with _ it's a service record lookup
orignal
well it solves the problem only partially
orignal
it doesn't seolve the problem with main domain
orignal
SRV record is a good idea
zzz
what's the problem with main domain?
orignal
how to make disributed system
orignal
with stats or reg
zzz
yeah, this isn't really related to addressbook much at all, but it could enable distributed DNS:
zzz
the DNS SRV is _domain._udp, add that to your LS, then you could have your own DNS or GNS server
zzz
or, you could put the GNS records like zones and keys directly into the LS, in DNS binary format, but that's messy
orignal
yes I understand what you mean
orignal
that's basically another implementation of my old ideawith subdomain
zzz
right. SRV records in LS2 are like broadcast DNS, but you can't send it queries; for that you need real DNS or GNS
orignal
are you publishing such LS2 already?
orignal
I need to check if I handle options properly
zzz
no, but long ago when we were developing LS2 I did put some dummy entry in there and let it run for a month or two
zzz
I could do that again just for a double-check
orignal
when do you think you will be ready with this?
zzz
just an idea right now. I'd want comments from everybody and a real review. The protocol part is easy, but the actual work to support it in susimail would be huge
orignal
I only care about options sections
orignal
if I handle it propely
zzz
maybe 6 months after it's reviewed and agreed to? there's a lot of other stuff that's higher priority
zzz
that part I can do today ))
orignal
but where is options section in LS2?
orignal
wait? it it type 9?
orignal
hmmm, I doubt I ever habdle options section
orignal
I see it first time today ))
zzz
we were planning ahead...
zzz
standard type 3
orignal
let me check the code
orignal
uint16_t propertiesLen = bufbe16toh (buf + offset); offset += 2;
orignal
offset += propertiesLen; // skip for now. TODO: implement properties
orignal
should work
zzz
:)
zzz
orignal, stats.i2p and zzz.i2p now up with a test option in the LS2 options, works for me
eyedeekay
github.com/go-i2p/go-i2p/releases/tag/0.0.1 and github.com/eyedeekay/reseed-tools/releases/tag/v0.2.34 are out, binary packages, upgrade instructions and PR to divaExchange to follow
zzz
nice eyedeekay how does it feel getting back into go-i2p? Going to have the router working by tomorrow? ))
eyedeekay
Not likely to have it working by tomorrow but knowing for sure it knows how to handle RI's of all shapes and sizes now is a pretty good feeling
eyedeekay
Encouraging, going to implement some more NetDB logic maybe since I spent so long staring at Java's
zzz
sounds like parsing 5000 RIs was a good test case?
eyedeekay
Yes it was
eyedeekay
**much** more thorough than the existing unit tests
zzz
lol nothing like a good test corpus
zzz
that's why things get so much easier once you're talking to other routers
eyedeekay
Yeah I need to take another whack at NTCP2 in Go this month if I can
eyedeekay
Find the time
zzz
plenty of time, 5 days left ))
eyedeekay
All depends on what I can do with the mess I have right now I guess
kytv
zzz: re: fielding questions at i2pforum, I just registered (I had an account at the old forum.i2p but not the new one)
zzz
thx kytv any help would be appreciated
kytv
ack