IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2024/05/15
zzz while I wait for eyedeekay...
zzz weko, orignal, none of the alternatives in your proposal address the problem of fake RI with old version
zzz it's useless without that
zzz I have an idea I'll explain later, but think about it...
eyedeekay Ack re: Debian changelogs, pushed moments ago
eyedeekay my news server will be up-to-date in a moment, ech's shortly after
zzz thanks
zzz eyedeekay, it's wrong, it has 'bionic' in there
zzz that would never have worked
zzz should I just change it, or do you have the real one somewhere?
eyedeekay I just changed it
zzz ok, will pull again
zzz looks like you flipped, torrent is popping off here
zzz focal sent off to launchpad test PPA
zzz you have your http su3 in place, right?
orignal zzz, disagree
orignal at some point we start honoring floodfills with version > x.x.x
orignal like we did in past
zzz right, but that would be a year or more away. we need something that works right away
orignal nobody say it's a instant fix
orignal its long term for future
orignal what's an issue now?
orignal use my way
orignal I don't connect through SSU2 to new routers
orignal until it's confirmed
orignal one for 3 ways
zzz and maybe longer for non-floodfills
zzz and your proposal doesn't say that
orignal 1. Incoming connection
orignal 2. Outgoing NTCP2 connection
orignal 3. Tunnel build reply
orignal no, it doesn't
orignal but I'm saying what we do in 2.52.0
zzz the "confirmed" stuff is messy, and not so easy for us, we need something better
orignal doesn't matter if a router is floodfill or not
orignal why is it messy?
orignal what is not clear?
orignal connect through NTCP2, if connected that it's good
orignal got incming connection it's also good
zzz it's clear, but we don't track those things now, and it's an ugly workaround that's not good for the network
orignal but I don't know if you check IP
orignal we track this in profiles
zzz if we're changing the protocol, we need a complete fix, not rely on a workaround for a year
orignal that's what I keep saying
orignal we need to fix SSU2
zzz right
orignal then it's easy
orignal once the fix is in place
orignal don't create outgoing SSU2 session to older versions
zzz I know how to really fix it, I'll explain it later this week, working on a release today
zzz just wanted you to start thinking about it
orignal about what exactly?
eyedeekay Yeah my su3 is in place at mgp
zzz no, I don't want that restriction about older versions, except (maybe) for ff
zzz I agree with you, fix SSU2, we're all standing by for 2nd draft of your proposal
orignal then I'm a shrimp ))
zzz thanks eyedeekay. Do I dare claim on twitter that bundle will be ready "soon", or you still fighting things?
orignal I don't know how to fix it without restrictions
orignal I'm busy at work right now
orignal and don't have time
zzz well, first you have to fix it to get rid of all the alternatives and tell us what you recommend
zzz not asking that you do it today ))
zzz but if you want it for next release we need to get un-stuck soon
orignal we agreed about extra MixHash and flag I presume
zzz no, we haven't agreed on anything, and I won't until we have a real review of an updated proposal
zzz with specifics
zzz eyedeekay, the build farm queue is 10 hours for ppc, 30+ hours for arm, and 3 days for s390x, hopefully most are lower priority than us, but who knows
zzz should we add riscv64? are there any chips out there yet or is it still emulators?
zzz its queue is 4 days though...
zzz ok, unless/until our launchpad builds finish, I'm done for the day, later...