IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2023/10/22
@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+dr|z3d
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+sourceress
Arch
Birdy
Danny
Irc2PGuest30010
Irc2PGuest36077
Irc2PGuest49364
Irc2PGuest51117
Irc2PGuest6564
Irc2PGuest65656
Irc2PGuest67278
Irc2PGuest74235
Irc2PGuest83482
MatrixBot
Onn4l7h
Over
Sleepy
Teeed
Yotsu
_bob_
aargh3
ac9f
acetone_
ahiru
anontor
b3t4f4c3__
cims
dr4wd3_
duanin2
eche|off
f00b4r
hababam_
hagen_
leopold
makoto
marek
marek22k
n2
nilbog
noidea
nyaa2pguy
o3d3_
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
solidx66
stormycloud[m]
test7363673
uop23ip
urist_
user_
w8rabbit
zelgomer
zzz
robin SAM3.1 can only have one STREAM ACCEPT pending at a time. But can it have multiple _active_ stream connections?
zzz no, both are unlimited
robin Spec says there is an ALREADY_ACCEPTING error in 3.1
zzz spec says:
zzz As of SAM 3.2, multiple concurrent pending STREAM ACCEPTs are allowed on the same session ID (even with the same port). Prior to 3.2, concurrent accepts would fail with ALREADY_ACCEPTING.
zzz but I think that's wrong, I think it was fixed in the 3.2 timeframe but was fixed for 3.1 as well
zzz try it and let me know
robin Ok, for now I will comment out the code that would have detected the condition and see what happens.
robin When the time comes I will need 3.1 and 3.2 routers to test against.
robin I suppose I cna build those from sources by fetching appropriate tags
zzz no need, just set the appropriate min/max
zzz I think I probably put that line in because we were waiting for i2pd to support it; not sure if they ever did, you'd have to ask orignal
robin So if I say HELLO VERSION MAX=3.1 then even a modern router will 'degrade' its functionality?
zzz yes
zzz that's the whole point of min/max
robin Ah, OK. Much easier
zzz I peaked at our code and I'm about 99% sure we support concurrent accepts. I peaked at i2pd's code and I'm about 80% sure they don't.
robin All I can detect is the SAM version number, not which implementation it is. But I will get the ALREADY_ACCEPTING error anyway
zzz yeah, java offers some 3.2/3.3 "bonus features" for 3.1 like that, no reason not to really
zzz I'll add a note to the spec
robin As long as i2pd advertises being SAM v3.1 it should all work
zzz right
zzz so that's why the spec says what it does