@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+acetone
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+weko
+wodencafe
An0nm0n
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest21357
Irc2PGuest21881
Irc2PGuest5995
Irc2PGuest89954
Leopold_
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
Soni
T3s|4_
aargh2
anon2
b3t4f4c3
bak83
boonst
cumlord
dr4wd3
dr|z3d
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
khb
mareki2p
not_bob_afk
plap
poriori
profetikla
r3med1tz
r3med1tz-
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
eyedeekay
And off it goes
obscuratus
It's been a minute since I updated master.
obscuratus
If a router is *NOT* a FloodFill, is there any reason to handle a DLM for anything but their own RI?
obscuratus
Maybe it's healthy for the network as a fall-back? Or maybe just drop those early.
obscuratus
Of course, with a segmented netDb, it should be a moot point.
dr|z3d
obscuratus: I now drop lookup requests from other routers for anything other than our own RI if we're not a ff.
obscuratus
Thanks dr|z3d
dr|z3d
here's the code:
dr|z3d
} else if (!_context.netDb().floodfillEnabled() && !_facade.shouldBanLookup(dlm.getFrom(), dlm.getReplyTunnel())) {
dr|z3d
if (_log.shouldInfo()) {
dr|z3d
_log.warn("Dropping " + searchType + " lookup from [" + dlm.getFrom().toBase64().substring(0,6) + "] " +
dr|z3d
"for [" + dlm.getSearchKey().toBase64().substring(0,6) + "] -> " +
dr|z3d
"We are not a floodfill [TunnelId " + dlm.getReplyTunnel() + "]");
dr|z3d
} else if (_log.shouldWarn()) {
dr|z3d
_log.warn("Dropping " + searchType + " lookup from [" + dlm.getFrom().toBase64().substring(0,6) + "] " +
dr|z3d
"for [" + dlm.getSearchKey().toBase64().substring(0,6) + "] -> We are not a floodfill");
dr|z3d
}
dr|z3d
one sec, I'll get you a link for the entire context/file.
dr|z3d
git.skank.i2p/i2pplus/I2P.Plus/src/commit/46f542914f229c7a353cb2cfee093f96ac6173b3/router/java/src/net/i2p/router/networkdb/kademlia/FloodfillDatabaseLookupMessageHandler.java#L71
obscuratus
OK, I was confused. Canon is also dropping DLM when we're not a FF, unless for our own RI.
dr|z3d
sounds about right, obscuratus, I think eyedeekay followed my lead on that iirc.
obscuratus
Haha! This is embarassing. I'm the one who changed that.
dr|z3d
!