@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+StormyCloud
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+radakayot
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
FreefallHeavens_
Irc2PGuest12735
Irc2PGuest22479
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest87933
Irc2PGuest90168
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy
T3s|4_
Teeed
acetone_
aeiou
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
boonst
cumlord
death
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
mareki2p_
poriori_
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz