@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest50191
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest8686
Irc2PGuest99002
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sisyphus
Sleepy_
T3s|4_
acetone_
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
bak83_
boonst
carried6590
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
mareki2p_
onon_
poriori
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz