@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+Stormycloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+mareki2p
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
AHOH
Arch
BubbRubb
C341
Daddy
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest12542
Irc2PGuest46813
Irc2PGuest57893
Irc2PGuest61215
Irc2PGuest82088
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sleepy
SlippyJoe_
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
b4dab00m
bak83_
carried6590
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
fus3r1
idontpee
ohThuku1
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
wew
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz