@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+hk
+mareki2p
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+segfault
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest58427
Irc2PGuest92548
Irc2PGuest96694
Irc2PGuest97710
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
T3s|4_
Teeed
acetone_
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
b4dab00m
bak83_
boonst
cumlord
death
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
onon_1
poriori_
profetikla
r3med1tz-
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz