@eyedeekay
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+cumlord
+eche|off
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+robin
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest14159
Irc2PGuest28800
Irc2PGuest93285
Onn4l7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
Stormycloud_
T3s|4
T3s|4_
Teeed
ac9f
acetone__
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83_
coolbuddy799
dr4wd3
dr|z3d
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
kaffi
leopold_
makoto
marek22k
nilbog
not_bob_afk
poriori
pory
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz