@eyedeekay
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN_
+Romster
+StormyCloud
+cims
+eche|off
+hagen
+nilbog
+nyaa2pguy
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+rednode
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
Holmes
Irc2PGuest17692
Irc2PGuest28384
Irc2PGuest37450
Irc2PGuest57320
OfficialCIA
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sleepy
T3s|4_
U1F642
Zapek
aargh4
ac9f
acetone_
ahiru
ananas_
dr4wd3_
duanin2
eyedeekay_
eyedeekay_bnc
leopold
mahlay
makoto
marek
n2_
not_bob_afk
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
sahil
test3847473
uop23ip
urist_
x74a6
zelgomer
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz