@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+acetone
+altonen
+dr|z3d
+hk
+lbt
+orignal
+postman
+radakayot
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BravoOreo
Dann
FreeB
FreefallHeavens_
Irc2PGuest11045
Irc2PGuest27999
Irc2PGuest28584
Irc2PGuest3338
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest82579
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sleepy_
Soni
StormyCloud
T3s|4_
Teeed_
aeiou_
aisle1
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
dickless
dr4wd3
enoxa
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
not_bob_afk
phil
plap
poriori_
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
solidx66_
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6h
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz