@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreeB
FreefallHeavens_
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest22728
Irc2PGuest51104
Irc2PGuest61213
Onn4l7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy
St1nt
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh
acetone_
ardu
b3t4f4c3___
bak83_
cumlord
death
dr4wd3_
duanin2
duck
el_stupido
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
makoto
nilbog-
nnm--
not_bob_afk
ohThuku1_
poriori_
pory
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
wew
wodencafe2
x74a6
T3s|4
o/ zzz - I'm really impressed by the amount of effort you've devoted to ssu2 evaluation, given the still 'limited' number of routers involved in testing. Are we still far too early from your POV to enable ssu2 by default for several releases, or are you planning a randomized, slower roll out (i.e. 5-10% of routers ssu2 enabled by default, with an opt-out option), beginning with
T3s|4
1.8.1 (aka 0.9.55)? Would obtaining a far larger ssu2 'tester' router/user base help you in the next release?
zzz
T3s|4, no decisions made yet, we're going to discuss it at the next meeting in #ls2 next Monday, 6:30 PM UTC, if you'd like to join us
T3s|4
noted, and thanks zzz