@eyedeekay
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+wodencafe
Arch
DeltaOreo
FreeRider
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest15271
Irc2PGuest28511
Irc2PGuest64530
Irc2PGuest77854
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
Sleepy
Soni
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh3
acetone_
anon4
b3t4f4c3
bak83
boonst
cancername
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
khb_
not_bob
plap
poriori
profetikla
r3med1tz-
rapidash
shiver_1
solidx66
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
x74a6
mesh
zzz: two things....
mesh
zzz: (1) thanks very much for fixing the issue with org.apache.http. Upgrading to 1.8 and it seems like the issue is fixed but I want to do more testing
mesh
zzz: (2) whenever I run my app the I2P code is generating logs...
mesh
was wondering how should i2p native applications that use the socket api configure the logging that i2p does?
zzz
mesh, via a logger.config file, or programatically via context.logManager(), or redirect everything by extending LogManger and context.setLogManager()
zzz
dr|z3d, I need expert snark css help please
mesh
zzz: thanks! I will look into context.setLogManager
dr|z3d
zzz: what's up?
zzz
ok
zzz
you know the message box at the top, and theres a scrollbar that appears when hovered over, and the clear log X icon jumps to the left when the scrollbar appears ?
dr|z3d
sure
zzz
so, as of whatever firefox I have now, the X icon doesn't jump to the left anymore, making it impossible to click on
zzz
still works in chrome
dr|z3d
try reducing the width of the ul or li.
zzz
is this something to do with z-index? because inspect element say that z-index doesnt work, blah blah static
dr|z3d
you can add a tracer to see exactly how wide the ul is.. just add a backround: #f00 tempomporarily.
dr|z3d
*background
dr|z3d
if that's not the issue, we'll have to rethink, but I suspect it might be.
zzz
never was a fan of the jumping X anyway. Why does the scrollbar hide itself, and can that be disabled?
dr|z3d
change overflow: auto; to overflow-y: scroll; on the parent.
zzz
the snarkMessages div is overflow: hidden
zzz
what am I looking for in the ul width, I can get that out of the inspector
zzz
this is not a z-index thing?
zzz
pretty sure this was not a css change on our side, but a firefox change
dr|z3d
it hides itself because cosmetics, the latest firefox on linux will do something vaguely similar, so you might not get the result you want there.
zzz
ff 100.0.2
dr|z3d
firefox prefs -> general -> always show scrollbars option.
zzz
pfft
dr|z3d
and no, not a z-index thing per se, more likely a width of the ul thing.
zzz
overflow: auto doesn't do anything
dr|z3d
overflow: auto is what you should have already. overflow-y: scroll is what you want to make the scrollbar persistent, but as I said, the firefox default behavior on Linux may override that.
dr|z3d
you could try a z-index shift, notwithstanding. set position relative on the ul and tweak accordingly.
zzz
playing with the right margin/padding on the ul, no change
dr|z3d
padding won't cut it, margin might, or just set the width.
dr|z3d
width: calc(100% - 40px) or somesuch.
zzz
the ul doesn't have a width now
zzz
the div is 100% - 12px
zzz
changing the div with didn't help
dr|z3d
try making the ul -> display: inline-block ?
dr|z3d
oh, hang on, just looking at my css.
zzz
adding width to ul doesnt help
dr|z3d
on the element with position: stikcky, still got that for the close icon?
zzz
the <a id=closeLog element?
dr|z3d
throw a z-index: 500 or something on that, see if that fixes. yeah, that's probably it.
zzz
that's the one with the z-index: 1000 that ff is complaining about doesn't do anything
dr|z3d
is it position: sticky ?
zzz
z-index has no effect on this element because it's not a positioned element
zzz
no, no position
dr|z3d
ah, you been fiddling again :P
dr|z3d
make it position: sticky; top: 2px (or whatever works to keep it hugged tight to the top of the div) and then the z-index should work.
dr|z3d
position: fixed or position: absolute may also work. see what works for you.
zzz
no, no fiddling
zzz
Blinded message
zzz
but the z-index is on #closeLog which is the id of the <a>
dr|z3d
ah, that could be it. z-index on the sticky element, move that to the <a>
zzz
adding position: sticky to the div makes the warning go away, but no other change
dr|z3d
want it on the close image or <a container> probably the latter.
zzz
z-index: 1000 on the img, no effect
dr|z3d
make sure <a> container for img as position: sticky, then add the z-index to it.
dr|z3d
*has
zzz
yeah that's #closeLog, did that, no effect
dr|z3d
lose position: sticky from the img. parent will have it.
zzz
no effect no matter what I do
zzz
you have the same issue on plus? can I just be lazy and let you find it?
dr|z3d
no, no issue here. resolved it years ago.
dr|z3d
biab
zzz
but never had the problem here until ff 100
dr|z3d
yeah, that's the new linux scrollbar mechanism
dr|z3d
you could try adding: scrollbar-width: thin; to the screenlog div, zzz.
dr|z3d
that might not be an acceptable solution, however, might be too thin to be useful.
dr|z3d
(I use a javascript height toggle to workaround that issue)
zzz
yeah that lets the left side of the X be clickable
dr|z3d
you could also try this: a:hover ~ ul {pointer-events: none}
dr|z3d
with the specific id of the close icon as the a id.
dr|z3d
*close icon a wrapper
dr|z3d
might be chicken and egg, though, it will only disable the ul if you can reach the a.
zzz
ok increasing the right margin on the X img enough to leave room for the scrollbar gets the job done
dr|z3d
*thumbs up*
zzz
so that would prevent the jumping X, and make it clickable always, downside is the X isn't in the corner anymore
dr|z3d
yeah, still don't understand why you can't shrink the width of the ul.
dr|z3d
it's the ul that's intefering with access to the close icon.
zzz
no, still jumpy on chrome
dr|z3d
if the ul is dispay: block then you can add use margin-right: auto to ensure it reduces its width, though inline-block might be preferable, given you can use pixels to determine margins (or a width: calc(100% - 40px) or whatever.
zzz
it's display: block
dr|z3d
reducing the width of the ul is probably your best be to ensure it doesn't overlap the close icon. or working out why you can't z-index the icon <a> link.
zzz
reducing the width has no effect
dr|z3d
put a background color on the ul and make sure when you reduce the width it removes the overlap.
zzz
I can see it when I hover on it with inspect element
zzz
I'll go with the margin change for now. thanks for your help
dr|z3d
what about padding, maybe that's extending the width of the ul to cause the overlap?
dr|z3d
sure thing, sorry we couldn't arrive at a quick, satisfactory-all-over solution. css, fiddly business sometimes. :|
zzz
I added 100 px of margin, way more than the padding
dr|z3d
strange. I know I spent more time than desirable working with the screenlog to fix the issue(s).
dr|z3d
but this was a year or more ago.
zzz
eyedeekay, did you get android 12 yet?
eyedeekay
No I think the maximum I have on a real device is Android 11, the rest I have to do in the Emulator
zzz
got it last week, my battery life went from a week to a day
eyedeekay
Ouch
zzz
phone only a few months old
eyedeekay
That seems incredibly wasteful on the vendor's part, I wonder if it was done in error?
eyedeekay
Yeesh I just found a blog that says it might be because the phones are repeatedly, actively checking for certain updates that they already have and that the only way to fix it sometimes is to factory-reset and reinstall the updates
eyedeekay
But that's just from googling "Android 12 battery drain"
eyedeekay
But I guess battery drain after updating to Android 12 happens to Pixel 5's support.google.com/pixelphone/thread/132037828/battery-drain-after-a-android-12-update-in-pixel-5?hl=en
zzz
seems like most of the complaints are pixel and samsung, which isn't what I have, and no definitive answer even for those
zzz
anyway, heads up, if you get the update, think before you click it
eyedeekay
Thanks I will