@RN
@ReturningNovice
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%acetone
%mareki2p
%snex
+Atticfire
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Over
+fa
+marek22k
+onon_
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+sexy
+uberius
+uop23ip
Arch
Danny
Irc2PGuest21708
Irc2PGuest28384
Irc2PGuest66257
Irc2PGuest75631
Irc2PGuest99986
RTP_
U1F642
Watson
ahiru
anontor
cims
i2potus
interesting
justaperson
lokzz
luvme
mahlay
makoto
n2_
nilbog
not_bob_afk
pinotto
r00tobo[2]
rednode
user_ygg2__
dr|z3d
welcome to #saltr, wssh
wssh
yo :)
dr|z3d
so I got disconnected while we were chatting in #i2p-dev earlier.. the relays for your project, using Tor's?
wssh
it hosts an exit node, as well, but no by itself it is not Tor.
wssh
just the exit is also my tor exit.
wssh
it's just a test network basically. it'll route, but nobody else is running nodes, nobody cares rofl.
wssh
i have thought about bridging the two but i view it as counter productive to what i'm trying to do, what are your thoughts? i feel guilty for even asking as it's not i2p related and i'm not trying to pimp my project on someone else's turf.
dr|z3d
ah, I suspected that might be the case. building a network the size of Tor's... well, that'
dr|z3d
s a fairly huge undertaking..
wssh
i wouldn't disrespect those more established than myself intentionally by pushing what i'm doing in these channels. that's like pissing off a mob boss.
dr|z3d
you'd probably be better off doing something with Tor's relays and overlaying your own stuff, no?
dr|z3d
we're fairly relaxed here, especially in this channel. don't feel you can't discuss your project, there may well be some cross-over.
wssh
I suspect doing so would result in blacklisting my nodes, as there's been no formal audits for soundness, and no real community to speak of.
dr|z3d
depends how you implement the overlay. if you're a client, Tor doesn't necessarily have the means to detect what you're up to.
wssh
as far as trying to piggy back off of tor, i think i'd be wise to try to get a formal audit first, before trying to do anything close, i was hoping to hear from paul syverson on my design but as of yet, my email remains un answered.
dr|z3d
not talked to nick or roger?
wssh
i have not, i think i should probably. do you think it's wise? i only thought paul as he invented onion routing as a whole.
wssh
he's kind of the 'gift horse' so to speak.
dr|z3d
I don't think paul features much in the way of development these days. I'd probably talk to nick, he's generally more available than roger, or was, on irc.
wssh
thank you for that, i'll try my luck. i do expect there to be many things wrong, and i even expect there to be a great deal of 'wtf is this' before i have something that makes people say... this is decent.
wssh
part of it is my own humilty, part of it is... it's a dream and some code. other than that, a lot more well established persons will naturally have critical inputs about it. i'm open to all of it. over the years i've learned there's always people smarter than me. ;)
dr|z3d
brb...
wssh
no worries, sorry i yack a lot.
dr|z3d
no harm in airing some ideas.. you should fine nick fairly approachable and reasonable in his assessment of your project.
dr|z3d
*find
dr|z3d
:)
dr|z3d
if nothing else, you'll probably raise a laugh or two with your ShitStorm transport. Made me chuckle.
dr|z3d
Always a good entry point, humor.
wssh
i appreciate the love, man.
dr|z3d
sure thing, keep doing what you're doing, it all helps :)
wssh
my main motivations for this, are primarily i believe in freedom and that anti-censorship is needed to promote true sharing of ideas, and free information exchange. in the current env, that is the state, and those who seek to profit off of people, without consent, these tools are needed.
dr|z3d
sure, we're all about the right to privacy here. something that's being constantly eroded.
wssh
without privacy, all the other amendments are an afterthought. it is only through the preservations of individual liberty, that any of it matters.
wssh
i for one never voted for FISA.
nyaa2pguy
thanks for the advice zzz
nyaa2pguy
I wonder if i could also implement something like a 'unreachable share', so my router accepts LU routers for up to 50% of the ntcp2 capacity, since lots of those routers are probably still "legit"
zzz
nyaa2pguy, re: s mismatch on NTCP incoming, I see a few of those routers, not a lot. they look like i2pd with messed up config.
nyaa2pguy
interesting
Quaddle
Howdy
Quaddle
*burb
nyaa2pguy
finally got a github account here's my horror show for the morbidly curious github.com/samueldaaaarling/i2p-cs-renewed
waffles
ok so i need to setup port triggering for i2p
waffles
im thinking i need to set 9000-31000?
waffles
and tcp+udp right
nyaa2pguy
the more random the port number the better, and yup both