@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%acetone
%cumlord
%mareki2p
%snex
+FreefallHeavens
+HowardPlayzOfAdmin
+Irc2PGuest51586
+Onn4l7h
+Over
+leopold
+onon_
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
H20
Irc2PGuest10122
Irc2PGuest83827
Irc2PGuest85653
Irc2PGuest96178
Meow
ac9f
anontor
dr|z3d
duck
halloy13412
mahlay
makoto
nZDoYBkF
nilbog
nnm--
not_bob_afk
ntty
r00tobo[2]
simprelay
solidx66
zer0bitz_
xHarr
lmao same. I'll go ahead and make that ticket tomorrow then
RN
nice, thank you xHarr
dr|z3d
I think the swarm numbers are valid.
dr|z3d
You won't necessarily see them all in your client, however, especially if they don't support PQ crypto and you do. + enables it by default for snark.
cumlord
yeah id trust what you see in client
cumlord
alyh/xharr noticed yesterday maybe postman got some sort of caching bug or client is spazzing
dr|z3d
I think it's more likely that a new big group of users has disovered qBitorrent and Tixati.
RN
doesnt the current implementatoin fall back if the other party doesn't support pq?
dr|z3d
the problem arises where the router doesn't support 6.
dr|z3d
if the router doesn't support PQ, then it won't fallback to 4.
dr|z3d
"have a LS, 6 or 4 encryption?" - "6? what the hell is 6? I'm not talking to you. kthxbye!"
cumlord
ha cool if it is the case, haven’t checked
uop23ip
dr|z3d, orignal : do i2pd (2daysold) and snark+ (latest dl) like eachother? It works and not that bad, but i got some of "Garlic: Can't handle ECIES-X25519-AEAD-Ratchet message" every 3-5s or so when snark+ is running
dr|z3d
Can't give you a definitive answer, uop23ip, but possibly an i2pd bug?
RN
I thought shinobi was a search. doesn't load without javascript, and with it just gives random 'characters'
RN
ahh there it goes
RN
nope, it is being flaky