IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#saltr
/2025/03/29
~dr|z3d
@RN
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens_
+Xeha
+ardu
+bak83
+hk
+profetikla
+r00tobo
+radakayot
+snex
+uop23ip
+weko
AHOH
Arch
BravoOreo
Dann
FreeB
Irc2PGuest22741
Irc2PGuest28584
Irc2PGuest3338
Irc2PGuest42806
Irc2PGuest47526
Meow
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
acetone_
aisle1
dickless
duck
enoxa
not_bob_afk
orignal_
plap
poriori_
qend-irc2p
simprelay
solidx66_
u5657
username
usr002
woodwose
dr|z3d do you have a config option to only use routers with in specified bandwidth tiers, orignal?
dr|z3d router.excludePeerCaps={netDBcaps}
dr|z3d This setting determines which peer capabilities will not be used to build your router's tunnels. e.g. router.excludePeerCaps=LMN
mareki2p Hi, I have another problem... I just updated I2P (Java 24, Windows) from 2.8 to 2.8.1. It is running for one hour already. And I added few info hashes into the built-in i2psnark. I get weird messages from it: Torrent file moved from C:\xxx.torrent to C:\xxx.torrent.BAD what is the reason for flagging torrent as bad?
dr|z3d try turning on snark debug logging, that may tell you more.
mareki2p How do I do that?
dr|z3d > /configlogging
RN mareki2p_, the message is actually a misfire
RN it is sayint the torrent is bad, but it really wants to say you are bad.
RN *** spanks mareki2p_ ***
RN eat your veg!
RN *** giggles ***
mareki2p hmmm )-:
RN did you make any progress with snark?
RN *** sends mareki2p some flowers and chocolates ***
mareki2p Enabled logging and copy & pasted all the torrents from other snark (standalone) that is connected to i2pd.
orignal No I don't
orignal and I told you why
dr|z3d well, that's how you ensure you don't have slow routers in your client tunnels.
orignal I take RTT from tunnel test
orignal and if it's more than 250 ms per hop I exclude such tunnel
dr|z3d that's not going to weed out slow (b/w) routers.
orignal monkeys publish X for slow routers. so?
orignal and for client tunnels I picck only O, p and X
orignal uunless i2p.streaming.profile=2
dr|z3d so you optionally exclude by b/w tier, and since you're already testing latency, test b/w at the same time.
orignal not the same
orignal in my case it's based on real situation rather than published
dr|z3d ok, so you ARE excluding by tier. that's what I asked.
dr|z3d in which case, you're performing some b/w tests as well?
orignal tunnel test
orignal you send a message with timestamp and get it back
dr|z3d right, so that's not bandwidth, that's latency.
orignal you never know real bandidth in advance
dr|z3d and you don't really care latency with snark, you care about bandwidth.
orignal because monkeys set X
dr|z3d *about
dr|z3d I guess that's where profiling comes in handy.
orignal I don't have profiling for bandwidth yet
dr|z3d call yourself a coder?
dr|z3d *** pokes orignal in the ribs. ***