#saltr (irc2p) | I2P+ 2.7.0-10+ >> i2pplus.github.io | skank.i2p | git.skank.i2p | purokishi.i2p | vituperative.github.io/i2pchat | natter.i2p | notbob.i2p | ramble.i2p | shreddit.i2p | cake.i2p | /msg an op for voice

dr|z3d you'll see a burst when the torrent is first made available, and thereafter a trickle of new downloads. that's especially the case for update torrents.

dr|z3d as for checking, you've got a link in snark to torrent's postman tracker page, assuming you downloaded the torrent from postman.

dr|z3d also, if you're in a swarm with 181 peers, you may not get selected, especially for smaller torrents. remember, vanilla snark maxes out connections per torrent to 24. in snark+, it's 300 per torrent.

orignal so what torrent should I pick?

dr|z3d your best best is to grab a bunch of active torrents.

dr|z3d look on postman, identify the torrents with a number of leeches..

orignal that's what I did

dr|z3d ideally larger torrents.

orignal what should be that seed/leech rate?

dr|z3d doesn't matter, just choose torrents that look like they're active, and new.

orignal I have "house of the dragon" like 24 peers

orignal same shit

dr|z3d more than one leech is generally a fair indication the torrent's active.

dr|z3d also, pm.

orignal thanks

orignal works

dr|z3d happy days \o/

orignal no bugs in the code ))

dr|z3d splendido!

zzz people have strange expectations on how fast bt-over-i2p "should" be... based on... nothing?

zzz that's why I suggested testing a SAM client in parallel

zzz for example, some torrents are severely seed-limited, see this one tracker2.postman.i2p/index.php?view=TorrentDetail&id=78923

zzz you'll d/l super-fast until you catch up to everybody else, then it slams to a crawl

zzz it's very different when you're the only leech with a ton of seeds

zzz third case is one fast seed and a ton of leeches, that's when you see a lot of far-end congestion

zzz you gotta recognize and understand those three cases as they behave very differently

dr|z3d orignal had a different issue. no one was downloading from his seed, which is pretty normal after the initial burst.

zzz sure

orignal I see upload now

zzz also, a mostly-snark torrent behaves very differently from a mostly-bigly one

orignal I thought it could be a bug in my new code

zzz meanwhile. over on clearnet, people are going over 2 GBps and hitting libtorrent/qbittorrent bugs ))) github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/21003

orignal so what's about settings?

orignal that custom speed keeps dropping to default

dr|z3d we're not quite there yet :)

zzz up or down? what default?

orignal both

orignal deafult like 202

orignal I set 1024

orignal and it often drops to 202 after restart

zzz that's the router bw limit you told it

zzz 202 is not a default

orignal huh? where does router bw limit come from?

zzz from the router

zzz I2CP bandwidth limits message

orignal what message?

orignal that explains

orignal my router in L)))

orignal but I need to investigate how it goes to I2CP

dr|z3d your mods to stroke opacity, zzz, you want to also apply those to fill/fill-opacity.

zzz huh? you can't have 4-byte stroke color?

dr|z3d wut wut?

zzz oh, the other way

dr|z3d you've done stroke, now fill..

zzz I have one color puker method that's used for both stroke and fill, I should have it covered. You're saying I don't?

dr|z3d if that's the case, nevermind. you're good I guess.

zzz you looking at code or guessing on what I have or haven't done?

dr|z3d I glanced at the patch and it looked like you were only handling stroke, not fill. guess I didn't pay enough attention.

zzz it's called addStroke() but see the comments, it does fill also

dr|z3d ok, I believe you :)

zzz it's private method, if it were public maybe I would have taken more care in naming it

dr|z3d either way, maybe a rename would be handy, given we're hoping this ultimately lands in rrd4j.

zzz good reminder to take some care, yeah

dr|z3d *thumbs up*

orignal 50 kbs upload

orignal not bad

orignal 210 kbs upload no downloads because everything have been downloaded

zzz so I guess I'm going to limit max conns for low-bw snarks as some guy was pushing?

zzz how does this look?

zzz + long bwl = getDownBWLimit();

zzz + if (bwl < 32*1024)

zzz + max = Math.min(max, Math.max(6, (int) (I2PSnarkUtil.MAX_CONNECTIONS * bwl / (32*1024))));

orignal what is "low-bw"?

zzz dialup speeds

orignal how does snark know about it?

orignal from that message

orignal I'm going to make it configurble

zzz guy complains snark doesn't work when he sets limit to 5KBps

orignal it shouldn't be based on router bandwidth

zzz it's not, router bw is just the upper limit

orignal oh you mean in snark

orignal yes go ahead

zzz not related you what you're doing. this is a conversation from a couple weeks ago

orignal I would set 500 kbs min

orignal for both direction

orignal can't afford it? don't torrent

zzz this guy wants 5 KBps which is 28.8 dialup modem speed

orignal borat?

zzz maybe thats what they have in kazhakistan?

orignal tell him that torrenting is not for him

orignal borat is nickname

orignal he is from Turkmenia

zzz thats what I said but got a lot of pushback

orignal clawn and alcoholic

orignal don't take him seriously

orignal only him might come with such dubm ideas

orignal *can

zzz I'll probably do it but not down to 5 KBps. Maybe 10

orignal why not L-level

orignal don't remeber how much

zzz router bw limits != participating bw limits

zzz snark doesn't care about participating bandwidth class

orignal ofc

orignal but L sounds reasonable

zzz L is 12-48

orignal I would set 48

cumlord if want to test upload i have some large season packs that will probably take a few days to seed, some in 5-10g range, some in 20g range

Titlacahuan orignal: if a second I2CP client connects with same session name, will you kick it or the first one out?

orignal need to take a look

orignal I don't remember

orignal htobe32buf (limits, i2p::transport::transports.GetInBandwidth ()); // inbound

orignal htobe32buf (limits + 4, i2p::transport::transports.GetOutBandwidth ()); // outbound

orignal SendI2CPMessage (I2CP_BANDWIDTH_LIMITS_MESSAGE, limits, 64);

orignal zzz, can it be an issue?

orignal simply speaking current code return current bandwidth usage rather than limits

orignal I don't know what do you use this message for