@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%snex
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Over
+fa
+marek22k
+onon_
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+sexy
+uberius
+uop23ip
+waffles
Arch
Danny
Holmes
Irc2PGuest12514
Irc2PGuest28384
Irc2PGuest47356
Irc2PGuest5812
Irc2PGuest73910
Meow
RTP_
SilentWave
acetone_
ahiru
anontor
cims
entity
interesting
justaperson
makoto
maylay
n2_
nilbog
not_bob_afk
pinotto
r00tobo[2]
red
sahil
user1
user_
user_ygg2_
orignal
yes I do now
orignal
Blinded message
orignal
I don't know what's wrong if someone publishes too many introducers?
orignal
2 concerns: size of RI and 2 digits index
dr|z3d
orignal: if there's a fixed amount set in the code, and someone's going out of their way to modify the code, chances are they're up to no good.
dr|z3d
based on recent attacks, assume the worst.
dr|z3d
so I ask again, what's a reasonable amount for decent network connectivity? is there any justification for more than 5?
zzz
this whole discusssion is silly, there's no agreement necessary
zzz
it's an extensible format. It's not appropriate to put something in the spec that some undefined options are illegal
zzz
additionally, when under attack, implementations are free to use whatever heuristics they want to take whatever action they want
zzz
that also doesn't belong in the specs
dr|z3d
ok, zzz, thanks for the input :)
dr|z3d
I'm going to stick with max 5 for now before ban unless I hear a persuasive argument for increasing the toleration.