~dr|z3d
@RN
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens_
+Irc2PGuest53011
+Xeha
+bak83_
+cumlord
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+snex
+uop23ip
AHOH2
Arch
BravoOreo
Dann
Irc2PGuest3921
Irc2PGuest60478
Irc2PGuest62721
Leopold_
Meow
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
acetone_
aisle
ardu
b4dab00m
dickless
enoxa
maylay
not_bob_afk
plap
qend-irc2p
radakayot_
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66_
u5657
username
usr002
weko_
woodwose`
zer0bitz_
orignal
yes I do now
orignal
Blinded message
orignal
I don't know what's wrong if someone publishes too many introducers?
orignal
2 concerns: size of RI and 2 digits index
dr|z3d
orignal: if there's a fixed amount set in the code, and someone's going out of their way to modify the code, chances are they're up to no good.
dr|z3d
based on recent attacks, assume the worst.
dr|z3d
so I ask again, what's a reasonable amount for decent network connectivity? is there any justification for more than 5?
zzz
this whole discusssion is silly, there's no agreement necessary
zzz
it's an extensible format. It's not appropriate to put something in the spec that some undefined options are illegal
zzz
additionally, when under attack, implementations are free to use whatever heuristics they want to take whatever action they want
zzz
that also doesn't belong in the specs
dr|z3d
ok, zzz, thanks for the input :)
dr|z3d
I'm going to stick with max 5 for now before ban unless I hear a persuasive argument for increasing the toleration.