@RN
@RN_
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%ardu
%cumlord
%mareki2p
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Over
+Sh0ck
+Xeha
+bak83_
+leopold_
+marek22k
+onon_
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo_BNC
+romer
+uop23ip
+waffles
+xHarr
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest10122
Irc2PGuest93285
Maylay
Meow
Stormycloud_
T3s|4__
ac9f
acetone__
anontor
coolbuddy799
dr|z3d
duck
halloy13412
makoto
nZDoYBkF
nilbog
not_bob_afk
pory
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
vivid_reader56
woodwose
zer0bitz
dr|z3d
if having a valid router family configured prevents cloning, maybe that's the solution.
dr|z3d
assign routers with a random family unless otherwise configured.
dr|z3d
and then ensure we don't ban valid families.
dr|z3d
older routers won't get the same protection, but nothing's explicitly broken. what you think, orignal?
RN
wouldn't that stop the user from making tunnels through the family members? Isn't that part of what family does?
RN
s/user/router/
dr|z3d
families would be unique per router unless otherwise configured.
not_bob
RN: It only keeps you from making tunnels that go through the same family. This would make every router that is not otherwise part of a family it's own family.
RN
ahh that makes more sense