~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%acetone
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Sh0ck
+bak83_
+bpb
+leopold
+r00tobo_BNC
+uop23ip
+xHarr
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
H20
Irc2PGuest16752
Irc2PGuest33667
Irc2PGuest97218
Maylay
Meow
ac9f_
anontor
b4dab00m
eyedeekay_
halloy13412
john231
makoto
nZDoYBkF
nilbog-
not_bob_afk
ntty
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
tmg86
tr
u5657
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
dr|z3d
snex: any more on the regex file filtering?
snex
dont wanna sound like a dick but as i dont run i2p+ i probably cant dedicate any time to working on it
snex
the basic change is in my github fork of the i2p.i2p repo
dr|z3d
doesn't have to be i2p+ specific, but your call. As we discussed before, a multi-select dropdown with regex strings + explanatory text in configs is the way to go, if you want to make it accessible.
dr|z3d
(explanatory text to be displayed in the dropdown)
not_bob
In my case, I just make a symlink to the default i2psnark data location. It works well.
snex
so its weird because i originally had that, and it worked. and then one day it just decided it no longer had write access and i dont know why
not_bob
zzz: RTP did a domain reg on stats.i2p, why does it take so long to show up?
dr|z3d
tarpitting, not_bob, zzz personally vets the submissions.
not_bob
Ahh, that would do it.
not_bob
And, yes. I can fully understand that.
not_bob
If I were to run a domain reg, I would do the same thing.
dr|z3d
RTP: also submit to reg.i2p
not_bob
I suggested he do that. I don't think subnmitting it to more than one will hurt anything.
dr|z3d
not at all.
dr|z3d
reg.i2p and stats.i2p covers most bases.
not_bob
*nod*
not_bob
reg.i2p even seems to pickup stuff off my list as well.
RTP
ah yes, I'm going to try out reg tonight to check out out
dr|z3d
have you got a b32 in the meantine, RTP?
RTP
yep got this one: ytiphpuyffui7zduhi6m42zusrjzolgfuv5j7cuc22n2dfg3jaaq.b32.i2p
RTP
and this link also shared / helps for the moment to those only knowing the righttoprivacy.i2p stats.i2p/cgi-bin/jump.cgi?a=righttoprivacy.i2p
dr|z3d
good stuff.
dr|z3d
intended hostname is rtp.i2p ?
RTP
righttoprivacy.i2p though originally I did consider rtp.i2p as it is easier. Eh well, maybe I should have stuck with the shorter one.
snex
porque no los dos
dr|z3d
it's all good. reg.i2p will allow you to register multiple names with the same destination address.
RTP
ahhh very cool to know thank you! I was actually wondering that as I rushed to come up with a name. ;)
dr|z3d
either way, your addressbook will have an address helper assuming you added it there.
dr|z3d
eg: righttoprivacy.i2p/?i2paddresshelper=9-crumZBs4XAhJOvsPM884ybyDtkeDG8Z-pVZxBcsEj35yu6ZkGzhcCEk6-w8zzzjJvIO2R4Mbxn6lVnEFywSPfnK7pmQbOFwISTr7DzPPOMm8g7ZHgxvGfqVWcQXLBI9-crumZBs4XAhJOvsPM884ybyDtkeDG8Z-pVZxBcsEj35yu6ZkGzhcCEk6-w8zzzjJvIO2R4Mbxn6lVnEFywSPfnK7pmQbOFwISTr7DzPPOMm8g7ZHgxvGfqVWcQXLBI9-crumZBs4XAhJOvsPM884ybyDtkeDG8Z-pVZxBcsEj35yu6ZkGzhcCEk6-w8zzzjJvIO2R4Mbxn6lVnEFywSPfnK7pmQbOFwISTr7DzPPOMm8g7Z
dr|z3d
HgxvGfqVWcQXLBI9-crumZBs4XAhJOvsPM884ybyDtkeDG8Z-pVZxBcsEj35yu6ZkGzhcCEk6-w8zzzjJvIO2R4Mbxn6lVnEFywSF2Tp3yv0FTKjU1RdIEVujoTKnR3ZMWbsZBQIb0-oiAxBQAEAAcAAA==
dr|z3d
that's the correct method to share a link to your site if you want people to have the hostname added to their addressbook
dr|z3d
if it doesn't, you can add it via the tunnel manager
dr|z3d
I2P+ has a link in the tunnel manager, and I think I2P has something similar, though not sure.
dr|z3d
that is, assuming it finds a hostname configured in your server tunnel config.
not_bob
RTP: You can use both.
dr|z3d
or use the b32 and provide an addresshelper link in a blog post. whatever works.
RTP
Cool thank going to try out reg.i2p just to see how it goes
RTP
thanks*
RTP
thanks for all the info. Always learning here. :)
dr|z3d
always a pleasure!
dr|z3d
enough for now, just shy of 100 new avatars on pr3t6cjlcth36djl3qgnfaollcvcs2kbzigzon6derjzjghttp4q.b32.i2p
zzz
if you didn't notice, I enhanced my new hosts page a few weeks back, now shows pending registrations hidden with ******* at stats.i2p/cgi-bin/newhosts.cgi
zzz
so after you submit you can see it worked immediately
zzz
and if you're stuck in the 30 day tarpit instead of the 3 day one, you can see that too
zzz
I was also careful to get the number of *** correct
orignal
what's going on with number of floodfills?
orignal
anybody noticed?
zzz
no
orignal
please check
orignal
I see only 700-800 now
orignal
and everybody else to
orignal
yesterday it was around 1200
zzz
1193, 1162, 1125 on 3 routers
orignal
what was yesterday?
orignal
they are coming back now
zzz
1200 24h ago
orignal
what happened couple hours ago?
zzz
my graph is flat
zzz
nothing
orignal
I will check
orignal
why all i2pd kicked so many floodfills
orignal
but it could be a reason like they because suddently unrechable or so on
dr|z3d
not seeing a major drop here, though yesterday saw a large chunk of routers disappear, they're back today.
orignal
maybe same cause
orignal
we have storger requirement for floodfills
orignal
like if it's not reachable we drop it for a while
dr|z3d
I think we do the same in +
orignal
what scares me if 1/4 of floodfiils belongs to an advesary it's not good sign
dr|z3d
China looks strange right now, in the netdb.
orignal
what happened if a Java router is overloaded? Will it become non-floodfill?
dr|z3d
possibly, not sure, and it also depends whether or not it's auo-floodfill or manually configured on.
zzz
depends what kind of overload, but yes
dr|z3d
the Chinese routers look like they may be run by the same entity. all 0.9.58, most of them X tier.
orignal
zzz is it possible that many Java routers became non-floodfiils in last few weeks and got replaced by advesary's?
zzz
probably not
orignal
what would overloaded Java router do?
orignal
*floodfill
zzz
it would have to be a sustained CPU overload for hours. it's not going to un-ff because of tunnel or bandwidth overload. so it's not likely
orignal
I'm asking if it stops accepting connections or not
zzz
no, other than the usual connection limits