~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@not_bob
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens
+RTP
+Xeha
+bak83
+cancername
+cumlord
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+uop23ip
Arch
DeltaOreo
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest28511
Irc2PGuest64530
Irc2PGuest75862
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
acetone_
anon4
anu
boonst
mareki2pb
plap
shiver_1
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
weko_
xeiaso
I have seen tunnels handling 1 MiB/s before
dr|z3d
theoretically speaking, yes.
uop23ip
Last month or so and wanted to test something. I wanted to be the nicest router in i2p
uop23ip
THe 50 KB/s per tunnel in my mind i thought i take my bandwith divide by 50KB and adjusted the max participating tunnels
uop23ip
wasn't a good idea. the general participating bandwith got down
uop23ip
Why was it a bad ideal? Shouldn't the bandwith per tunnel have increased?
RN
also depends on demand
dr|z3d
network conditions are volatile from one day to the next. if you're a low bandwidth share router and you increase your shared bandwidth, it may take several days for the network to adjust, vis-a-vis your router.
dr|z3d
generally speaking, the more you share, the better the performance of your router is in relation to your local tunnels.
uop23ip
So you mean that's the reason i got 1k+ participating tunnels with most Bps? Because to many non participating routers trigger a demand? Ratio of participating routers/non-participating routers is not good?
dr|z3d
no. the more bandwidth you share, the better for your router, generally.
dr|z3d
bandwidth allocated to your local tunnels will always take precedence over participating traffic.
dr|z3d
the other way of managing bandwidth is to set your share at whatever your isp allocates, and limit the number of participating tunnels your router will handle.
uop23ip
Make it sense to limit the number of part tunnels to provide more bandwith per tunnel, then?
dr|z3d
that's the general idea. you don't artificially limit the speed of your participating tunnels.
uop23ip
Let's say that i only connect to high speed peers and so they do and we all have our configuration so that it will allow a high bandwith per tunnel. What would be besides the latency of hops the speed issue? The speed of the cpu to encryptpackages?
dr|z3d
sure, there's an overhead for encryption.
uop23ip
dr|z3d, What do think about the ratio of active/known/integrated. For me int/known is 1/2 active/int 1/1.1.
uop23ip
Not everyone is integrated. It's almost the same non. Or am i interpreting this wrong?
dr|z3d
if your router's functioning ok, then I wouldn't worry about ratios. If you're much more than 2K integrated/floodfills, then the network's probably under attack.
dr|z3d
integrated == floodfill.
uop23ip
oh ok. still learning. :). Is the non participating router called NPRs :)
dr|z3d
NPR is an acronym you just invented. Well done. :)
uop23ip
got so confused. Nice to find one.
RN
so, if I paint my home red does that make me a comunist or republican? No. How does a measurement system make one a communist? It doesn't. It is just a different reality measuring model.
obscuratus
The communists and republicans are good buddies now. It shouldn't be a problem either way.
RN
but whatever color I paint my house only has meaning for me if I assign any
RN
it might be a homage to my father who had a red nose from drinking too much
RN
it might be because my surveilance cameras work better with the red background
RN
y'all been silly this $DAYPART
RN
especially albat aka starwars_character
RN
LOL