~dr|z3d
@RN
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%acetone
%mareki2p
%snex
+Atticfire
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Over
+fa
+marek22k
+onon_
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+sexy
+uberius
+uop23ip
Arch
Danny
Irc2PGuest21708
Irc2PGuest28384
Irc2PGuest66257
Irc2PGuest75631
Irc2PGuest99986
RTP_
ReturningNovice
U1F642
Watson
ahiru
anontor
cims
i2potus
interesting
justaperson
leopold
lokzz
luvme3
mahlay
makoto
n2_
nilbog
not_bob_afk
pinotto
r00tobo[2]
rednode
user_ygg2__
obscuratus
What's the rationale for forbidding the use of client tunnels for Database searches?
eyedeekay
TBH with you obscuratus I don't know it offhand
obscuratus
It look's like I2PD made a change recently that eliminates them. I was wondering if we should follow.
obscuratus
You can use exploratory tunnels instead, and then eliminate having to do safety and security checks for Database messages in client tunnels.
obscuratus
Just don't do Database messages in client tunnels. Exploratory only.
obscuratus
But, there's always tradeoffs. :)
eyedeekay
Yeah it's worth analyzing while we have the time
obscuratus
One drawback I see is that users may not realize there are anonymity consequences to changing the number of hops in your exploratory tunnels.
obscuratus
If nothing else, is has me curious to change it to exploratory, and see how many Database related messages I still get down my client tunnels.
obscuratus
I shouldn't get any if I'm not making any DSM queries on my client tunnels.
xeiaso
The more code I read the less I understand.
xeiaso
If you shouldn't be able to deduce that two destinations are hosted on the same router, then why do destination share the exploratory tunnel pool?