IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#saltr
/2023/05/01
~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%cumlord
+BeepyBee
+FreefallHeavens
+H20
+Onn4l7h
+Sh0ck
+bak83
+onon_
+qend-irc2p
+uop23ip
+xHarr
Arch
BubbRubb
Dann
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest10122
Irc2PGuest16211
Irc2PGuest16546
Irc2PGuest35641
Irc2PGuest35761
Irc2PGuest61752
Irc2PGuest82658
Irc2PGuest84025
Irc2PGuest974
Maylay
Meow
T3s|4
ac9f
acetone_
anontor
duck
halloy13412
leopold
makoto
mareki2p_
nZDoYBkF_
not_bob_afk
ntty`
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo[2]
simprelay
snex
solidx66
thetia
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
orignal I would suggest to send some block with SessionCreated contain Bob's ident hash
orignal so Alice would know who she is talking to
obscuratus For those on Java I2P who want to play around with some of this, you can tune sybil in a few ways.
orignal so my another idea is static keys profiling
obscuratus For reference, the configuration variables are in: router/java/src/net/i2p/router/sybil/Analysis.java
obscuratus You can turn off sybil with: router.sybilEnableBlocking
orignal if a static key received from Alice it's good key
orignal if someone else has this static key but points ot different ident
orignal we drop such router as fake
orignal rememeber most of time floodfills publish themselves as Alice
orignal and a fake router can't be Alice
not_bob That sounds simple enough.
eyedeekay Makes sense but requires you to have met router as Alice before, right?
orignal that's a low hanging furit
orignal if we don't have this static key in table we presume that router is good
orignal it will take some time to sort things out but i exepect to collect all static keys of floodfiils in few hours on a FF and in few days on a non-FF
dr|z3d -15+ uploaded with more aggressive mitigations for the current attack.
obscuratus When I'm able to pull up these rogue FF routers with the browser NetDB entry page, these routers all have exactly the same information shown.
obscuratus Yet, they're getting different entries in the NetDB. What's the non-viewable parameter that's different, and why can't we just use that to ploink the duplicate entries?
eyedeekay obscuratus I think we can ploink them, I am in the ER right now but as soon as I get my laptop here I'll show you what I have