~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@T3s|4_
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%RTP
%acetone
%cumlord
%snex
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Over
+Sh0ck
+leopold
+nyaa2pguy
+onon_
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+waffles
Arch
Danny
H20
Irc2PGuest24727
Irc2PGuest57061
Irc2PGuest62007
Irc2PGuest66987
Irc2PGuest6989
Irc2PGuest96878
Irc2PGuest96985
Junkyard5
anontor
duck
floatyfloatilla
halloy13412
mahlay
makoto
nilbog
not_bob_afk
ntty
poriori_
quack_
r00tobo[2]
shaye
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.