~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@not_bob_afk
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%snex
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Over
+bak83
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo_BNC
+uop23ip
+xHarr
Arch
BeepyBee
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
H20
Irc2PGuest10330
Irc2PGuest2981
Irc2PGuest4145
Irc2PGuest46844
Irc2PGuest6537
Meow
ac9f
acetone_
anontor
floatyfloatilla
leopold
leopold_
mahlay
makoto
nZDoYBkF__
nilbog
ntty
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.