~dr|z3d
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@T3s|4
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%cumlord
%mareki2p
%snex
+BeepyBee
+FreefallHeavens
+Irc2PGuest54355
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Over
+leopold
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+waffles
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
H20
Irc2PGuest13210
Irc2PGuest19134
Irc2PGuest21940
Irc2PGuest2739
Irc2PGuest32330
Irc2PGuest5631
Irc2PGuest74254
Meow
T3s|4__
ac9f_
acetone_
anontor2
floatyfloatilla
gellegery
halloy13412
makoto
maylay
n1_
nZDoYBkF
nilbog
noidea_
onon_1
poriori_
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
thetia
u5657
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.