~dr|z3d
@RN
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%acetone
%cumlord
%mareki2p
%snex
+BeepyBee
+FreefallHeavens
+H20
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+waffles
Arch
BubbRubb1
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest10998
Irc2PGuest17671
Irc2PGuest32330
Irc2PGuest38649
Irc2PGuest56676
Irc2PGuest59851
Irc2PGuest74254
Meow
Over1
Stormycloud_
T3s|4__
ac9f_
anontor
floatyfloatilla
halloy13412
mahlay
makoto
nZDoYBkF
nilbog-
not_bob_afk
poriori_
r00tobo[2]
shaye
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.