~dr|z3d
@RN_
@T3s|4
@not_bob
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%acetone
%cumlord
%mareki2p
%snex
+BeepyBee
+FreefallHeavens
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+onon_
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+waffles
Arch
BravoOreo
BubbRubb1
Danny
H20
Irc2PGuest41816
Irc2PGuest49393
Irc2PGuest65329
Irc2PGuest70755
Irc2PGuest82912
Irc2PGuest83366
Irc2PGuest90684
Meow
Over1
StormyCloud__
ac9f
anontor
floatyfloatilla
gellegery
halloy13412
mahlay
makoto
n1
nZDoYBkF
nilbog
noidea
ntty
poriori_
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
user1
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.