~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
%acetone
%ardu
%cumlord
%snex
+FreefallHeavens
+Xeha
+bak83
+hk
+mareki2p
+poriori
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
AHOH2
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest96164
Leopold_
Meow
NewRO
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
boonst
evasiveStillness
l337
maylay_
not_bob_afk
not_human
pisslord
r00tobo[2]
shiver_
simprelay
thetia
u5657
weko_
zer0bitz_
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.