~dr|z3d
@RN_
@Stormycloud
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%cumlord
%mareki2p
%snex
+BeepyBee
+FreefallHeavens
+H20
+Onn4l7h
+Onn4|7h
+Over
+dollarthief
+leopold
+profetikla
+qend-irc2p
+r00tobo
+uop23ip
+waffles
Arch
BubbRubb
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest21940
Irc2PGuest41816
Irc2PGuest49393
Irc2PGuest74254
Irc2PGuest77078
Irc2PGuest99336
Meow
StormyCloud_
T3s|4
ac9f
acetone_
anontor
floatyfloatilla
mahlay
makoto
n1
nZDoYBkF__
nilbog
not_bob_afk
ntty
onon_1
poriori_
r00tobo[2]
simprelay
solidx66_
u5657
vivid_reader56
zer0bitz_
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.