@RN
@RN_
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@itsjustme
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+Xeha
+cumlord
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+r00tobo
+snex
+uop23ip
+weko
An0nm0n
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
Irc2PGuest17611
Irc2PGuest1833
Irc2PGuest28588
Irc2PGuest31002
Irc2PGuest87477
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
StormyCloud
acetone_
anu
ardu
boonst
deadface
dickless
dr|z3d
floatingspawk
mareki2pb
not_bob_afk
onon_1
pisslord
qend-irc2p
r3med1tz-
radakayot_
shiver_sc
simprelay
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
woodwose
AmyMalik
had a dumb idea
AmyMalik
it's for preventing MAIL FROM forgery in i2p and tor, by providing a token system, where the recipient server would hold up the sender, contact the putative sender server's token program, ask the sender server "do you recognize this token?", and it'd give a K for yes, Z for "maybe quarantine it?" or D for no - which would then be used to decide the disposition of the message. Unlike
AmyMalik
with clearnet email, where there's an IP address, and my personal recommended action for SPF fail is to quarantine, I would recommend, for a token exchange fail, that the receiving mailer drop the message, either 4xx 4.x.x for a Z or a "you forgot to turn up your token server", or 5xx 5.x.x barred by sender policy for a D from the token server.