~dr|z3d
@RN
@RN_
@StormyCloud
@T3s|4
@T3s|4_
@eyedeekay
@not_bob
@orignal
@postman
@zzz
%Liorar
+FreefallHeavens
+Over
+Xeha
+bak83
+cancername
+cumlord
+hk
+poriori
+profetikla
+uop23ip
Arch
DeltaOreo
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest28511
Irc2PGuest64530
Irc2PGuest75862
Meow
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
acetone_
anon4
anu
boonst
mareki2pb
plap
shiver_1
simprelay
solidx66
thetia
u5657
weko_
RN
aloha Quaddle
Quaddle
Surf´s up RN !
RN
Σ:Đ
Quaddle
Any news ?
RN
well... in general, no... the thing with the trump investigation is old news... nothing big personally...
RN
SSU2 is coming soon for I2P
Quaddle
SSU2 ? Putin ?
RN
SSU2 is part of the protocol/crypto update
RN
just ongoing development
RN
almost ready for release as I understand it
RN
what's new with you?
Quaddle
haha
Quaddle
I have a Droid now and i am in degoogleing it
Quaddle
Otherwise is supper break
Quaddle
PC is good
Quaddle
Will move to deb though
Quaddle
summer not supper
Mustafabo
hi itsjustme
Mustafabo
I heard you like Dick's
Mustafabo
dr|z3d, itsjustme likes Dick's
itsjustme
Hey Mustafabo
itsjustme
I do, don't you?
itsjustme
I like dr|z3d dicks
dr|z3d
oO
mesh
huh
mesh
dammit java is so annoying sometimes. It's so obvious these guys at oracle don't actually eat their own dogfood.
mesh
does anybody have any performance numbers on SSU2?
dr|z3d
4, 18, 12, 43 and power ball 34.
dr|z3d
joking aside, R4SAS has done some testing on i2pd, but their SSU1 implementation sucks, apparently.
mesh
I find it strange all this work is done on SSU2 without perf numbers
mesh
though I was able to significantly improve i2p performance using: router.peerTestConcurrency=12
mesh
router.peerTestTimeout=500
mesh
I can actually kinda watch videos now over i2p
mesh
the last time I set router.peerTestTimeout to 500 I found the pool of available peers to be too small
mesh
but by increasing peerTestConcurrency I seem to have mitigated this
mesh
it's been working well all week in terms of perf
mesh
I wonder how many desktop users these days still have 4gb ram
dr|z3d
concurrency just means you test more peers at the same time, which may or may not help. unlikely it does of itself, but on a newly started router conceivably it might get you more low latency peers sooner.
dr|z3d
not that it should take that long to test all the peers in your netdb.. remember, you're not testing a fair chunk of peers we deem not suitable for local traffic.
dr|z3d
if you count the number of .dat files in ~/.i2p/netDb/ that'll indicate approx how many peers you're testing in total.
dr|z3d
which will be a significantly lower number than whatever the sidebar tells you are your Known peers.
mesh
according to techtalk.pcmatic.com/2016/10/05/average-pc-memory-ram-continues-climb the average pc already has ~8gb of ram
mesh
dr|z3d: yeah I get that. But for some reason, with 1.8, I was able to get better performance using peerTestTimeout=500 and increasing the concurrency. On 1.7 setting peerTestTimeout so low hurt more than it helped
dr|z3d
curious, mesh
mesh
it seems like most people have 8gb these days
mesh
though I consider anything less than 32gb to be horrible, 8gb is a lot.
kou
oo i got +v'd
kou
thanks
dr|z3d
you're welcome, kou, and welcome to the channel.
kou
thanks, found out about it from another (unrelated) pepper on xmpp
dr|z3d
i2p, i2pd, or i2p+?
kou
i like i2pd because i find it simple to configure
dr|z3d
did you try i2p or i2p+ then?
kou
i havent tried i2p+ but i didnt like having to use a browser to configure regular i2p
kou
i didnt however see if there was a config file for i2p though
dr|z3d
well that's a misconception, if you're someone who prefers config files. i2p/i2p+ can be configured via console.
kou
amazin'. ill check it out again then.
dr|z3d
to configure the router, ~/.i2p/router.config
dr|z3d
to configure individual tunnels ~/.i2p/tunnel.config.d/
dr|z3d
to configure the service (wrapper), ~/i2p/wrapper.config
dr|z3d
this assumes you're on linux or thereabouts, though it's broadly the same for windows, with different folder locations.
kou
ah
kou
seems simple then
dr|z3d
with that said, configuration via UI does confer plenty of benefits, not least better feedback, more intuitive configuration. and whereas i2pd will require a restart of the router to update the configuration, for the most part i2p/i2p+ doesn't.
dr|z3d
but if you've only tried i2p to date, you might want to take i2p+ for a spin.
kou
i dont think i2pd needs a full restart for config changes (i just do a reload), but are you saying that changes i2p(+) apply almost instantly?
kou
changes in*
dr|z3d
pretty much.
kou
woa
dr|z3d
via UI changes take effect (mostly) as soon as you hit the save button. editing the router.config file will take a few seconds to take effect, as soon as the router.config file is polled.
dr|z3d
a few settings will require a restart, but that's fairly rare.
dr|z3d
latest RC I2P+ installer (works on linux and windows) on linux -> java -jar i2pinstall.exe -> gitlab.com/i2pplus/I2P.Plus/-/jobs/artifacts/master/raw/i2pinstall.exe?job=Java8
dr|z3d
for a console install, java -jar ./install.exe -console (recommended to set install path to ~/i2p/)
kou
~/i2p/ instead of ~/.i2p/ to avoid conflicting with regular i2p?
kou
also thanks
dr|z3d
you can install over the top of regular i2p.
dr|z3d
and no, i2p/ is the application directory, ~/.i2p/ is the user configs.. if you've got a pre-existing i2p install, you might want to move ~/.i2p/ somewhere else so you start clean.
kou
ah
dr|z3d
oh, and the same with ~/i2p/ tbh.
dr|z3d
just rename both folders.
dr|z3d
then you start with I2P+ optimized configurations, including the wrapper (service) config.. with a pre-existing install, you won't get the full benefit of preconfigured addressbook subs, service configs and various other configs.