@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+orignal
+weko
Irc2PGuest88897
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
aargh2
acetone_
anon2
cancername
eyedeekay_bnc
hk
not_bob_afk
profetikla
shiver_
u5657
x74a6
dr|z3d
> ok, party time at transit central. 13K part tunnels on one router, and climbing.
orignal
same here
orignal
Transit Tunnels: 5825
dr|z3d
yeah, it's calmed down from earlier somewhat.
dr|z3d
WARN […Handler 1/3] …ipatingThrottler: Temp banning router [7yerdd] for 12 minutes for excessive transit tunnel requests (Limit: 20 in 220s)
dr|z3d
WARN […Handler 3/3] …ipatingThrottler: Temp banning router [5~9D1C] for 14 minutes for excessive transit tunnel requests (Limit: 20 in 220s)
dr|z3d
WARN […Handler 1/3] …ipatingThrottler: Temp banning router [znxuzV] for 6 minutes for excessive transit tunnel requests (Limit: 17 in 220s)
orignal
Transit Tunnels: 6458
dr|z3d
Peer [F96R4T] published their RouterInfo in the future
dr|z3d
• Published: Thu Nov 26 10:04:24 GMT 2037
orignal
almost 100 Mbs cap again
dr|z3d
on the plus side, we're now seeing some usage that we weren't before. on the minus side, it's probably all originating from very few routers.
orignal
my suspect is outproxies
orignal
all monkeys rushed i2p to get "an access to Instragram"
dr|z3d
that doesn't tally with what I'm seeing.
dr|z3d
on the outproxies, 99% of the traffic is internal.
dr|z3d
:)
R4SAS
a bit of stats:
R4SAS
Uptime: 24 days, 7 hours, 32 minutes, 43 seconds
R4SAS
Network status: OK
R4SAS
Tunnel creation success rate: 33%
R4SAS
Received: 4030.00 GiB (6153.26 KiB/s)
R4SAS
Sent: 4183.57 GiB (6691.01 KiB/s)
R4SAS
Transit: 3980.42 GiB (5973.27 KiB/s)
R4SAS
Routers: 7400 Floodfills: 1651 LeaseSets: 0
R4SAS
Client Tunnels: 52 Transit Tunnels: 5283
R4SAS
that is silly VPS, where reg.i2p is hosted
R4SAS
s/silly/small/
R4SAS
Dedicated server s2:
R4SAS
Uptime: 18 days, 20 hours, 1 minute, 58 seconds
R4SAS
Network status: OK
R4SAS
Network status v6: OK
R4SAS
Tunnel creation success rate: 58%
R4SAS
Received: 2678.95 GiB (6118.75 KiB/s)
R4SAS
Sent: 2828.40 GiB (6452.00 KiB/s)
R4SAS
Transit: 2615.06 GiB (5860.52 KiB/s)
R4SAS
Routers: 8001 Floodfills: 1503 LeaseSets: 0
R4SAS
Client Tunnels: 241 Transit Tunnels: 14960
R4SAS
hit the limit 15K
zzz
I wrote a vanity b32 generator. It's about as fast as the i2pd tools one
zzz
what are our thoughts on vanity? dumb and we should not encourage them? or valuable or nice for some people?
zzz
> pkf -v aaaaaaaa vanity.dat
zzz
Initializing vanity generator
zzz
Test run with 10000 hashes: 99 ms
zzz
Estimated hashes per second per thread: 101 K
zzz
Estimated hashes per second with 6 threads: 606 K
zzz
Estimated hashes required for length 8: 1.1 T
zzz
Estimated time for length 8: 20 days
zzz
Starting vanity generator (6 threads)
orignal
no, it's not
orignal
you need a real one ))
orignal
look at b32 address of kkk.i2p ))
orignal
do you have nvidia GPU?
zzz
don't know, probably not
orignal
I can give you cuda code
orignal
was too lazy to rewrite to opencl
orignal
that's one we actually use
zzz
what's the hashes per second?
orignal
don't remember
orignal
7 char would take less then a minute however
orignal
on 1050
zzz
for me:
zzz
Estimated time for length 7: 15 hours
orignal
that's what I mean
orignal
you need a real one ))
orignal
one in i2pd-tool is just a reference implemntation
zzz
I don't need a vanity b32 of any length ))
orignal
then how long do you need?
orignal
10 takes hours or maybe days but still doable
zzz
I don't, I'm just playing around
orignal
then whole idea is to try nonce on the last block of padding
orignal
then you use midsate
orignal
and hash 2 blocks only
orignal
but thank you for reminding
R4SAS
10 taken 2.6 days in my case
orignal
I think time to write opencl one
orignal
on 1060
zzz
Estimated time for length 10: 58 years
orignal
lol
orignal
also if you play with it
orignal
why don't you try sha-ni?
zzz
oh yeah that's interesting, just change the last part of the padding
orignal
ofc if your CPU supports it
orignal
I didn't have time for it
R4SAS
vminer.exe data\r4saswashere.dat r4saswashere 22
R4SAS
Starting with 4194304 threads
R4SAS
Continuing from last saved nonce: 22733903626240
R4SAS
[22742288039936 (5672 ms)] 2000: Hash rate 739 Mh/s
R4SAS
[22746482343936 (5750 ms)] 3000: Hash rate 729 Mh/s
R4SAS
[22750676647936 (5688 ms)] 4000: Hash rate 737 Mh/s
orignal
when this miner was written there was no sha-ni yet
R4SAS
[<nonce> (taken time)] <iterations>: ...
zzz
ok, about a thousand times faster than mine is
R4SAS
that's GTX 1060
R4SAS
idk what will happen on GTX 30XX
zzz
but, original question, are vanities good or bad or don't care?
orignal
we always use them ))
R4SAS
really dont care
orignal
sportloto.., citrus...
orignal
also it can be used as kinda PoW
orignal
you olly allow connection from b32 starting with particular phrase
orignal
*only
zzz
if there's a GPU vanity generator out there, then it's not too helpful for security
orignal
not everybody has a goog GPU
zzz
you guys could offer vanity-as-a-service and charge BTC for it... but then you'd have the private keys, so probably a bad idea
zzz
well, I guess somebody could do the keypair themselves, then give you the pubkey
zzz
checked, I don't have sha-ni on any box
orignal
the whole idea is
orignal
you don't need private key for it
orignal
you need only public key and adjust padding
orignal
ok. go and buy one on the boxing day
orignal
every cheap Ryzen has it now
orignal
yes we had this idea for paid vanity generator ))
orignal
and that's one of the reason why we don't publish cuda miner for everybody
zzz
right
zzz
the only time I ever messed with GPUs was when I bought a box to mine meeh's anoncoin
zzz
what gpu is it...
zzz
Radeon 7850 from 2014. Is that any good?
zzz
dreadtoobigdsrxg4yfspcyjr3k6675vftyco5pyb7wg4pr4dwjq.b32.i2p is 11, but maybe he just went for 5 and then picked something interesting
orignal
does it support opencl?
dr|z3d
it was ok in 2014 :)
zzz
I peaked at about $200 worth of anoncoin, but the attackers were driving up the difficulty to like one day per block, so it became pointless
orignal
we still use our GPUs for gostcoin
orignal
well as I said I can rewrite to opencl
orignal
because I mostly use RX580s anyway
zzz
the anoncoin cuda stuff was an enormous PITA to get working
orignal
however really buy a modern CPU
orignal
ryzen G alsos have built-in GPU
orignal
huh? anoncoin cuda was just scryot
orignal
one day we has hijacked more then 50% hash power there
orignal
with our videocards ))
zzz
I don't remember but I had a lot of trouble compiling it
zzz
anoncoin was such a mess. the difficulty calculation was so screwed up, they would drive it up to one day per block, then wait for it to get super easy again, get all the blocks
zzz
it just got stupid
zzz
ok by keeping intermediate hash state I'm down from 58 to 36 years for length 10
orignal
lol
R4SAS
xDDD
orignal
btw last anonocoin used gosycoin's pow ))
orignal
anyway worth to buy a Ryzen-G
orignal
cheap and had all modern features
orignal
plus GPU