@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+not_bob
+orignal
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest75862
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
aargh3
acetone_
anon4
cancername
eyedeekay_bnc
profetikla
shiver_1
u5657
weko_
x74a6
orignal
I don't have MTU implemented it
orignal
it's always 1488 for now
zzz
sure but whatever it is, don't go over :)
orignal
looks like two different problems
orignal
btw what is 1517?
orignal
including UDP and IP headers or just payload?
zzz
1517 was including udp and ip headers and SSU2 header and SSU2 MAC
orignal
that explains
orignal
that part will be fixed
orignal
and hence no buffer overflow
orignal
just extra headers
orignal
1488 + 28 = 1516
orignal
that where it comes from
zzz
48 for ipv6, don't forget :)
orignal
yes I know
orignal
I counted it
orignal
got SSU2: PeerTest msg=4 code=65 again
orignal
any idea why it happens?
orignal
e.g. how do you pick session with Charlie?
orignal
and SSU2: PeerTest msg=4 code=70 from another
orignal
and SSU2: PeerTest msg=4 code=68
orignal
but this one seems reasonable
orignal
SSU2: RelayResponse status code=70
orignal
interesting code 70 for PeerTest and for RelayIntro
zzz
Peer Test responses as charlie last 6 days
zzz
0 60%
zzz
65 24%
zzz
67 2%
zzz
68 12%
zzz
70 1%
zzz
Relay responses as charlie last 6 days
zzz
0 0%
zzz
65 50%
zzz
67 38%
zzz
68 3%
zzz
70 9%
orignal
my question is where 65 comes from
orignal
basically why it happens
orignal
especially for relay
orignal
since Alice know where is she trying to connect to
zzz
looking...
orignal
for 67 I need to double check
zzz
for relay, the 65's are all 6to4 addresses 2002::
zzz
for peer test, the 65's are either 6to4, or port 0
orignal
for Alice?
zzz
yes
orignal
but why I receive 65?
orignal
I'm 2001:470
zzz
the peer test or relay address for alice is invalid
orignal
peer test
orignal
it looks like Bob chooses ipv4 session with Chralie
orignal
and Chrlie doesn't support ipv6
zzz
we will never connect to or test or relay to a 6to4 address 2002::
orignal
I don't care
orignal
but you said Alice has such wrong address
orignal
and I receive 65 on Alice with 2001:470
zzz
the bob/charlie connection is usually ipv6
orignal
do you check charlie when pick Bob-Charlie session?
zzz
right, you are bob, you asked me charlie to do a peer test with alice [2002:b28d:383b:0:0:0:b28d:383b]:9733
orignal
for compatibility
orignal
that's another problem
orignal
I'm asking about my own Alice
zzz
I think so. It's compatible, it's just not a valid address
orignal
but again my address is defintly valied
orignal
and I receive 65 frequetly
zzz
ok let me look for you as alice
orignal
I don't know who was Charlie
orignal
and it doesn't happen with relay response
orignal
but this strange 70
zzz
2RRY is not at 2001:470
orignal
not 2RRY
zzz
70 is mostly fixed, only happened once in last week
orignal
one with ipv6 only
orignal
what was the issue with 70?
orignal
and why I receive it for both peer test and relay
orignal
my impression that you don't recognize first RouterInfo block
zzz
I think I mentioned, I wasn't handling out-of order, now I delay and recheck if I don't have RI yet
orignal
it only happens when Bob is i2pd
orignal
yes but it's not the case
zzz
so probably just java routers that don't have the fix yet
orignal
i2pd sends RI, relay intro blocks in one message
orignal
and I got 70 if Bob is i2pd
zzz
put the relay intro block before the RI block, it will probably help
orignal
no, that 70 was through 2RRY
orignal
and relay was sent to you
orignal
my concern is that it happens with both peer test and relay
zzz
I know what router that is, my routers really really don't like it. I think it's banning it or something else is wrong
zzz
I can't load the RI on any router
orignal
I don't understand
orignal
that RI was mine
zzz
I don't understand either, but there's something wrong with that ipv6-only router of yours
zzz
4 days ago the relay signature was failing, and I've never been able to lookup the RI from a ff
orignal
that's right
orignal
I run it rarely and it's not in netdb
zzz
ok
orignal
but it doesn't explain why 70
orignal
you should receive it in RI block
orignal
you think RI block is invalid?
zzz
I don't know. leave it running and we can try to figure it out
orignal
fine. will do for couple hours
orignal
07:58:05@187/info - SSU2: RelayResponse status code=70
orignal
can you take a look?
orignal
it's just now
orignal
70 is from you
orignal
and at the same time
orignal
07:58:03@187/debug - SSU2: PeerTest msg=7 code=0
orignal
another attempt
orignal
08:07:44@187/info - SSU2: RelayResponse status code=67
orignal
67 looks better
zzz
yes, 70 first time, 67 the next time
zzz
also had a 67 4 days ago
zzz
The RI looks fine
zzz
but the signature of the relay data is bad
orignal
then why 70?
zzz
looking...
orignal
I'm checking signature
orignal
looks like you recognized RI from first message ib second message
zzz
ok. this is a i2pd bob PeGQ
zzz
the first time there was no RI block, only a 172 byte packet:
zzz
06-26 13:58:03.358 DEBUG [ handler 1/1] outer.transport.udp.PeerState2: New 172 byte pkt 92 rcvd on [2a05:4800:3:161:0:0:10:c]:11916 PeGQYG
zzz
the second time there was a RI block, 1136 byte packet:
zzz
06-26 14:07:44.426 DEBUG [ handler 1/1] outer.transport.udp.PeerState2: New 1136 byte pkt 96 rcvd on [2a05:4800:3:161:0:0:10:c]:11916 PeGQYG
zzz
the first time I returned a 70, next time a 67
orignal
maybe they run older code
orignal
found another bug
orignal
when I pick Charlie I don't exlude session with Alice
orignal
will fix it
orignal
for peer test
zzz
don't know why bob would not send RI first time, would send RI second time
zzz
and of course other problem is the signature
orignal
because it was different Bov, no?
orignal
or it's the same?
orignal
if it's the same I guess I know why
orignal
race condition
zzz
I've had 14 relay signature failures in last week. 10 are from that ipv6 router.
zzz
not sure how many bobs
zzz
looking...
orignal
both cases are clear now
orignal
will fix
zzz
about 4 different bobs, all i2pd
orignal
found the issue with signature
orignal
ver is missing
zzz
great
orignal
10:17:07@644/info - SSU2: RelayResponse status code=68
orignal
68 now
zzz
yes I see it
orignal
I did something wrong
orignal
because I couldn't parse some messages from you
orignal
but at least I tried to connect
orignal
lol. I have an incoming connection from your to that router
orignal
hence can't test relays