IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2pd-dev
/2023/04/10
@Xeha
@orignal
Arch
CIVINULL
Danny
Irc2PGuest72879
Irc2PGuest88897
Meow
Over
R4SAS
RN
RN_
acetone_
anon2
aside
b3t4f4c3
cancername
enoxa
eyedeekay
hagen_
hk
poriori
r3med1tz
rapidash
semantica
shiver_
u5657
weko
x74a6
yeti
orignal SSU2 doesn't work trought the Tor. Period.
orignal I will check what happens if asscoiation fails
PacManArch @orignal
PacManArch Can SSU2 use a Socks5 proxy generated by WireGuard as a front-end proxy?
PacManArch1 Can [ntcp2] use Tor Socks5 as a front-end proxy?
PacManArch1 proxy = socks://10.0.6.1:10020 <wireGuard-Socks5>
PacManArch1 ## Enable NTCP2 transport (default = true)
PacManArch1 enabled = true
PacManArch1 ## Publish address in RouterInfo (default = true)
PacManArch1 published = true
PacManArch1 ## Port for incoming connections (default is global port option value)
PacManArch1 # port = 4567
PacManArch Hi Orignal, I have a question about i2pd. Due to my poor network environment, I deployed i2pd on a VPS in Sweden and am using Wireguard to convert a Socks5 proxy for SSU2 and NTCP2. However, when checking the Web interface, I only see the following information: NTCP2 supported, NTCP2v6 supported, SSU2 0.0.0.0:2423, and SSU2v6 [0.0.0.0]:2423. I'm not sure if this is correct, as I am paranoid about privacy
PacManArch offer? Should I enable additional options in the default configuration? Also, I should mention that my VPS does not have IPv6.
orignal the problem is not SSU2
orignal the problem is Tor
orignal it doesn't supprt UDP
orignal if you see 0.0.0.0 it means that your UDP prioxy doesn';t work
orignal try shadowsocks
R4SAS privoxy didn't support UDP either
orignal only 3proxy and dante