IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2026/03/22
@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN_
+Romster
+T3s|4
+acetone
+cims
+eche|off
+hagen
+mareki2p
+mesh
+nilbog
+nyaa2pguy
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+red
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
Holmes
Irc2PGuest28384
Irc2PGuest84270
Irc2PGuest92627
NiceBoat_
OfficialCIA_
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
SilentWave
Sleepy
T3s|4_
U1F642
Wikk_0
Zapek
aargh4
ac9f
ahiru
anontor
dr4wd3
duanin2
eyedeekay_
eyedeekay_bnc
ice_juice
leopold
mahlay
makoto
n2
not_bob_afk2
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
test3847473
thetia
uop23ip
urist_
utp
vivid_reader56
x74a6
zelgomer
zzz Irc2PGuest952, have some questions about the 'testing more advanced installer' when you're around
Stormycloud Happy to answer any questions on my failed wix experiment
zzz ok first what was the goal and then have some followups on process
Stormycloud Goal was to make a more in depth installer, auto speed test, having user select ports, unpn, some of the more common options. With the knowledge that windows users are more accustom to the next next next install process
zzz ok, so, some growing pains here on process, no big deal, but the website probably isn't the right place to host experiments
zzz think about what hat you're wearing when you start someting - you, your org, or the i2p org, and host it accordingly
zzz we have scars from people starting stuff then somehow our group is responsible for it, it became official without any discussion
Stormycloud The windows one isnt on i2p.net or am I thinking of something else completely
zzz so we try really hard to make an acutal decision before I2P supports/hosts it
zzz this is scripts/installlinux.sh on i2p.website I'm talking about
zzz about a dozen changes in last 2 days
zzz *static/installlinux.sh
Stormycloud Ah, yes alright. This is just automatic install script that runs through the commands we have linux distros. So instead of joe typing all the ppa commands it does it and installs i2p
Stormycloud But I understand your concern as well
zzz so lets have some boundaries, we love experiments, but let's not host them on the official website
zzz if it becomes something you're proud of, then we can talk about where it would live and who would support it
zzz there's an overdue discussion to be had on the same issue about go-i2p as well
zzz yeah Irc2PGuest39805 so in summary the official website repo is the worst possible place to do experimental script development, or any development, please move it elsewhere
zzz orignal_, I'm working on SSU2 MLKEM 768 handshake MTU issues, I have some notes
Stormycloud i2p.website. PR created. Can discuss here or offline
not_bob Is i2p accepting donations again?
not_bob Stormycloud: Also, thank you for having my eepsite front and center at that booth recently.
Stormycloud Yes not_bob I2P is accepting donations. Of course helpful resource for all new and old users
not_bob I'm glad to hear that. I know donations were not accepted for a long period of time.
orignal tell me
orignal ofc I'm asking about MTU
zzz so ofc MLKEM-678 session request and session created are pretty big
zzz but Bob doesn't know Alice's MTU when he sends session created
zzz session created is a little smaller than session request but still pretty big
orignal bob knows
orignal that Alice's MTU is enough for SessionRequest
orignal and SessionCreated is always smaller
zzz right, but may not be smaller if you want to add a lot of padding
zzz so the answer is: use the size of the session request packet as the MTU for session created
orignal well I can use SessionRequest size as MTU
orignal lol we think the same ))
zzz or actually max(minimum MTU, session request size)
zzz exactly
orignal good point
zzz so I figured that out and I'm adding it to the spec
zzz EOT on that
orignal but what
orignal the difference is almost 100 bytes
zzz just to document what the max size is, in case somebody wanted to add 200 bytes of padding
zzz yeah it's 96 bytes
orignal hence if your padding is u to 32 or even 64 your are always good
zzz right but I know you're on a 'more padding the better' campaign ))
orignal my padding is up to 40
zzz just trying to document everything and make sure we're on the same page
orignal more padding is for regular x25519
zzz I'm 32 for session request and 64 for session created right now for ssu2
orignal thanks. will do the same
zzz can;t remember why ))
zzz maybe, if you have better idea let me know
orignal address block maybe?
zzz anyway, looking through the logs last couple days, everything looks good
zzz yeah address block adds a little
zzz but still, hard to get to 96 more
orignal 96 is for PQ only
zzz right
orignal I see the issue with SessionCreated
orignal will fix it
zzz testing my sessioncreated calculations:
orignal for some reason I create padding up to max size
zzz 03-22 22:17:02.365 ERROR [ Establisher] r.transport.udp.PacketBuilder2: v4 msg2 pktlen 1260 pqlen 1104 mtu 1349 padding 24 max 1349
zzz ok good we had the discussion then ))
orignal don't remeber why
orignal anyway time to fix
orignal will change to 64
zzz also ofc both request and created have to be smaller than your own MTU
orignal I know
orignal something worng with both paddign sizes
zzz I didn't, I do now ))