@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN_
+Romster
+acetone
+cims
+eche|off
+hagen
+mareki2p
+mesh
+nilbog
+nyaa2pguy
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+red
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
Holmes
Irc2PGuest28384
Irc2PGuest84270
Irc2PGuest92627
NiceBoat_
OfficialCIA_
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
SilentWave
Sleepy
T3s|4_
U1F642
Wikk_0
Zapek
aargh4
ac9f
ahiru
anontor
dr4wd3
duanin2
eyedeekay_
eyedeekay_bnc
ice_juice
leopold
mahlay
makoto
n2
not_bob_afk2
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
test3847473
thetia
uop23ip
urist_
utp
vivid_reader56
x74a6
zelgomer
zzz
eyedeekay, thanks for supporting that CCS. He really beefed it up with tangible milestones instead of time-based
zzz
which was my objection before, he pushed back pretty hard but glad to see he gave in
zzz
StormyCloud, I do not think you should be the sole funder, it's important that it has XMR community support as well
zzz
I suggest no more than 50% of total
zzz
maybe it was your insistence on milestones that changed his mind, good job
snex
anybody who beats me at sunday night movie trivia (#trivia channel) is entitled to 0.01 monero which they can direct anywhere they want including this CCS
snex
*wins the game, not just beats me
snex
imo we should do more stuff like this on i2p to attract real users
zzz
lol pretty small stakes but why not
snex
well its every week, i aint rich. maybe ill pledge my winnings to this
snex
since im the one funding the game
snex
how do i actually donate
zzz
CCS funding is used for signalling support so in that sense the amount doesn't matter much, hope you chip in regardless of the trivia result ))
snex
i dont see an addy for this CCS
snex
i guess it has to advance beyond the "ideas" stage?
zzz
yeah I think it has to move from proposal to needs-funding first
zzz
orignal, two times yesterday that may have worked, 12:29:25 PM and 4:52:52 PM our time
orignal
may?
zzz
"may" as in I didn't see any errors, not logging at a low-enough level to verify success
orignal
let me try again today
orignal
I was busy yesterday
zzz
do you have logs for those timestamps?
orignal
no errors
zzz
ok thats promising
orignal
it doesn't explian why it doesn't work somethimes
zzz
my problem is my test code to force an outbound connection seems to be flaky, can't figure it out yet, so I'm just watching logs
zzz
haven't given up looking
orignal
zzz, I think your min packet size is wrong for 4
orignal
ML-KEM-768 key size 1184
orignal
+16 bytes hash
orignal
header is 64 bytes
orignal
and payload block is 7 bytes datetime + 16 bytes hash
orignal
1287
orignal
+ 48 bytes ipv6 header
orignal
1335
orignal
never mind, the specs says 1338
orignal
now
orignal
you are good
zzz
yeah because 7 byte datetime isn't enough payload, add a 3 byte 0-padding block, got me to 1338
orignal
then tell me why I often see request of 87 bytes?
zzz
no idea. spec says:
zzz
The minimum payload size is 8 bytes. Since the DateTime block is only 7 bytes, at least one other block must be present.
orignal
I know bu I see it often
zzz
so you tell me why. or where is it coming from
orignal
will log
zzz
orignal, here's what I have in my code, that it was your old bug:
orignal
so, 90 bytes min for SessionRequest?
zzz
if (type == SSU2Util.SESSION_REQUEST_FLAG_BYTE &&
zzz
packet.getPacket().getLength() == SSU2Util.MIN_HANDSHAKE_DATA_LEN - 1) {
zzz
// i2pd short 87 byte session request thru 0.9.56, drop packet
zzz
if (_log.shouldWarn())
zzz
_log.warn("Short Session Request len 87 from " + from);
zzz
return true;
zzz
}
orignal
wow, 87 bytes is mine ))
orignal
should I set this check to 90?
zzz
I guess you could
orignal
and we have 0.9.58 min since last release
orignal
due to cognesion tags
orignal
so, 90 should be right
zzz
yup "7 + one other block" = 10
orignal
thnaks
zzz
even you forget things sometimes ))
orignal
zzz, why don't you just create a tunnel with explicitPeers to test outbound connections?
zzz
all that stuff is commented out in my code, it's too disruptimve to normal operation. I have a UI replacement, thats what may be flaky