IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2026/01/11
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN_
+Romster
+T3s|4
+acetone
+eche|off
+mareki2p
+nilbog
+nyaa2pguy
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
Arch
Daddy_I2P
Danny
Irc2PGuest15434
Irc2PGuest16019
Irc2PGuest20377
Irc2PGuest31938
Irc2PGuest35412
Irc2PGuest48148
Irc2PGuest77921
MatrixBot
NiceBoat
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
Sisyphus
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh4
ahiru
anontor
b3t4f4c3__
cims
dr4wd3_
duanin2
ice_juice
mahlay
makoto
marek
n2
noidea
not_bob_afk2
o3d3
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
rednode
solidx66_
stormycloud[m]
sublimia
test7363673
uop23ip
urist_
vivid_reader56
wodencafe2
x74a6
zelgomer
orignal zzz, I see the problem with v=4
orignal currently i2pd expects v=2 and if not consider an address as invalid
orignal so my suggestion is to publish v=2 and pq=4
zzz orignal, that's what we decided already, that's what I'm doing zzz.i2p/topics/3697
orignal doing what?
dr|z3d <orignal> so my suggestion is to publish v=2 and pq=4
dr|z3d that ^
orignal zzz, is it what you are doing now?
zzz yes
zzz thats what we decided in august and I documented on that post linked above
orignal I remember
orignal but the problem is that
orignal v=2 pq=4 is only PQ
zzz if it's only PQ do v=4
zzz you said you were doing same port?
orignal thanks
orignal I though it's oppiste
orignal my mistake
orignal yes, my NTCP2 supports both
orignal based on highest bit
orignal and own eligibinit
zzz good
orignal *eligibilit
orignal *eligibility
orignal can someone check?
orignal back now
orignal but people complain
RN did these people follow RN's i2p rule #1? Try at least 3 times before you decide something is down.
orignal 3 different people from different locations tried
RN 3 people, but did they each try to reload at least 3 times before giving up?
RN just my experience. 3 tries usually works, even if tunnel was closed on idle
RN I do 3 tries, then check notbob or isitup
cumlord worked for me