IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2025/05/07
@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN_
+T3s|4
+acetone
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+mareki2p
+not_bob
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
Birdy
BravoOreo
BubbRubb1
Danny
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest20240
Irc2PGuest41816
Irc2PGuest45228
Irc2PGuest70755
Irc2PGuest72713
Irc2PGuest83366
Irc2PGuest90684
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe_
StormyCloud__
aargh2
ac9f
anontor
b3t4f4c3__
dr4wd3
duanin2
gellegery
leopold
makoto
n1
nilbog
onon_
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
user1
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
x74a6
zelgomer
zzz starting 5,4 server testing... doesn't work...
zzz copy/paste bugs, unfinished code...
zzz more bugs...
zzz eyedeekay, how's it going on NTCP2?
eyedeekay I didn't get time to finish that test when I wanted but I haven't got *anything* else to prioritize today so I'm going to make this test pass today, if I can
eyedeekay If I can do that, then I have data messages to do next and then I'll have something a lot like an NTCP2 transport
zzz if gitea has settled down you should have a pretty good 3 week window here before the release to make real progress
eyedeekay Should be pretty normal from here on out, that thing where the service could survive the shutdown of one or more listeners was a little annoying but it's fixed now
eyedeekay So I can manage it properly with systemd
zzz orignal, I got 5,4 working
zzz ok I have zzz.i2p running with 5,4 and stats.i2p with 6,4
orignal let me try
orignal and again 333.i2p is 4,5 too
zzz got it
orignal will try zzz.i2p from 5
orignal zzz.i2p doesn't seem to work with 5
orignal while 333.i2p does
orignal please check
zzz orignal, I had to change my log levels, please retest
orignal opens now
orignal lhbd7ojcaiofbfku7ixh47qj537g572zmhdc4oilvugzxdpdghua , rigth?
zzz good, no errors seen here. I also tested 333.i2p with type 5, works
orignal but still the question why it didn't work before
zzz yes lhbd7...
orignal to make sure it was really 5
zzz that doesn't prove you used 5
zzz unless you were 5-only on your side
orignal I looked through the list of sessions
orignal and saw that oner uses type 5
zzz I haven't tested 5,4 clients yet
orignal mine was 5,4
orignal if you log LS info
zzz cwddnbncz66ujggmg3gnbtw6fcibw4rg3dyusumasdmpedcsrr5a.b32.i2p 5,4
orignal yes, this one
zzz thanks for testing. I had to fix about 5 bugs this morning to get it working
orignal great ))
segfault zzz: could you tell me diffrence between s, e, rs, re, h, ck, k, n, ee, se, es, ss keys? i have never seen "static and ephemeral" kinds of keys
segfault zzz: i know only secret and public kinds of keys
orignal RTFM called NOISE specs
segfault orignal: that's why i asked about "ephemeral" and "static" keys. noise specs doesn't describe what is it
zzz segfault, it's the dictionary definition of "ephemeral" : temporary, one-time-use
segfault zzz: one-time-use for one session? or unique?
zzz one session
zzz and the "static" ones are your permanent ones, that you publish in your RI
segfault zzz: ok, thx