@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+Irc2PGuest3601
+R4SAS
+RN
+StormyCloud
+acetone
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
Arch2
Birdy
BubbRubb
Chrono
Dann
DeltaOreo
Guest99
Irc2PGuest12868
Irc2PGuest27269
Irc2PGuest65801
Irc2PGuest74254
Irc2PGuest79605
Irc2PGuest90985
Irc2PGuest92550
Irc2PGuest95708
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
Stormycloud_
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f_
anontor2
b3t4f4c3__
dr4wd3
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
gelleger1
leopold
makoto
matean
n1
nilbog
not_bob_afk
null911
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
solidx66
thetia
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.