@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+acetone
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb1
Chrono
Dann
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest11113
Irc2PGuest16211
Irc2PGuest16546
Irc2PGuest29990
Irc2PGuest35641
Irc2PGuest36377
Irc2PGuest6405
Irc2PGuest64361
Irc2PGuest82658
Irc2PGuest83248
Onn4l7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f
b3t4f4c3
bak83
dr4wd3
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
idk_afk
leopold_
makoto
mareki2p_
not_bob_afk
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
xHarr
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.