@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN_
+Stormycloud
+T3s|4
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
Arch
BubbRubb
Daddy_
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Guest99
Irc2PGuest13210
Irc2PGuest20240
Irc2PGuest21940
Irc2PGuest22255
Irc2PGuest32330
Irc2PGuest74254
Irc2PGuest76033
Irc2PGuest78101
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
SlippyJoe_
T3s|4_
Teeed
Uncrushed_
aargh2
ac9f_
acetone_
anontor2
b3t4f4c3___
dr4wd3
duanin2
erniee
eyedeekay_bnc
fus3r11
leopold_
makoto
nilbog-
noidea
onon_1
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66_
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
wodencafe2
x74a6
zelgomer
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.