@eyedeekay
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN_
+Romster
+Stormycloud
+acetone
+cims
+eche|off
+nilbog
+nyaa2pguy
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+sidereal
+wodencafe
Arch
Danny
Irc2PGuest10884
Irc2PGuest77921
Irc2PGuest90275
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
Zapek
aargh4
ac9f
ahiru_
anontor
b3t4f4c3__
calamares
duanin2_
eyedeekay_
i2potus
leopold_
mahlay
makoto
marek
mareki2p_
n2
not_bob_afk2
o3d3
poriori
profetikla
quack
r00tobo
rapidash
rednode
sahil
sublimia_
test7363673
uop23ip
x74a6
zelgomer
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.