@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+StormyCloud
+acetone
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+not_bob
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
Arch2
Birdy
BravoOreo
BubbRubb
Chrono
Daddy_
Dann
Guest99
Irc2PGuest2010
Irc2PGuest20149
Irc2PGuest30832
Irc2PGuest49068
Irc2PGuest63942
Irc2PGuest74254
Irc2PGuest86777
Irc2PGuest88361
Irc2PGuest95708
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over
RN
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
T3s|4_
Teeed
Yotsu
aargh2
ac9f
anontor
b3t4f4c3__
dr4wd3
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
gelleger1
leopold
makoto
mareki2p_
matean
n1_
nilbog
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
wodencafe2
x74a6
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.