@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+hagen
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
+user5
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono2
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest14567
Irc2PGuest32330
Irc2PGuest51098
Irc2PGuest59842
Irc2PGuest59851
Irc2PGuest74254
Irc2PGuest88931
Irc2PGuest96952
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
Stormycloud_
T3s|4_
Teeed
Uncrushed_
aargh2
ac9f
anontor
b3t4f4c3___
dr4wd3
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
leopold_
makoto
null911
orignal_
poriori_
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_1
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip_
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
x74a6
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.