@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+Stormycloud
+acetone
+cumlord
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+snex
Arch
BubbRubb1
Chrono
Conserje
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest15904
Irc2PGuest70600
Irc2PGuest74352
Onn4l7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh
ac9f
b3t4f4c3___
bak83_
combed_tree328
coolbuddy799
dr4wd3_
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
leopold
makoto
mareki2p_
nilbog
nnm--
not_bob_afk
polka
poriori
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
wodencafe
x74a6
xHarr
eyedeekay
Re: CI for izpack5 I can do it as long as I use the snapshots
dr|z3d
just an idea. fork 4, keep our own repo, hack on it.
zzz
knock yourself out. 4 is 13 years old and horribly fugly on linux. we switched to 5 for a reason
eyedeekay
Ack, it's relatively straightforward to set up as long as I don't have to build it myself in the CI pipeline
dr|z3d
4 works ok for me, better now it's got pack200 baked in, 5 was always hit and miss for me, universal installer never worked properly on all platforms.
dr|z3d
if it ain't fixed don't broke it :)
dr|z3d
or something.