orignal
yes I agree
orignal
how about high bandwidth tunnels?
orignal
I use 0.9.51
zzz
we don't have anything different for high bw, but we're bumping it for all tunnels from 0.9.58 to 0.9.59
zzz
we don't really have to coordinate on that
orignal
huh? you choose 0.9.58 for now?
orignal
I choose 0.9.51
orignal
just asking
zzz
yes, it was 58, just changed it to 59
orignal
that's why you have high TBR )))
zzz
we changed it from 51 to 58 in January because of the 0.9.56 botnet
zzz
maybe
orignal
and as result we saw spike of tunnels
zzz
maybe? hard to say
orignal
I build expolratory through any routers
orignal
sometimes useing variable TBM
orignal
if not supported
zzz
we're now at about 90% client build success, 47% expl. build success
zzz
most of the 0.9.56 routers are botnet, you're not going to have much luck building tunnels through them, I don't recommend it
orignal
no really
orignal
say I build OB and it's malfunctining
orignal
then I thry to build IB and send request through that OB and it will fail
zzz
maybe
zzz
but trust me the 0.9.56 routers are terrible
orignal
thanks
orignal
will change it shoutly
orignal
to 0.9.59
orignal
btw is it a botnet or just version in debian?
zzz
58 would fine unless the chinese botnet comes back ))
zzz
definitely a botnet imho, they all appeared at once. In January? don't remember.
zzz
and they have not gone away, they are still around. lots and lots and lots
zzz
look at your netdb
orignal
will do
zzz
what % is 0.9.56?
orignal
will do later topday at 2RRY
zzz
Blinded message
zzz
*be ~ 1.5%
orignal
then why do we care?
zzz
if you care about tunnel build success
orignal
not too much
orignal
but it's worth to bump version anyway
orignal
because bugs
zzz
ok