@eyedeekay
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+wodencafe
Arch
DeltaOreo
FreeRider
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest19353
Irc2PGuest46029
Irc2PGuest64530
Irc2PGuest77854
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
Soni
T3s|4_
Teeed
aargh3
acetone_
anon4
b3t4f4c3
bak83_
boonst
cancername
cumlord
dr4wd3_
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
khb
mittwerk
not_bob_afk
plap
poriori_
profetikla
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
u5657_1
uop23ip
w8rabbit
weko_
x74a6
eyedeekay
I have seriously never hated any piece of software as much as I hate gitlab right now
eyedeekay
I'm going to start calling the knot in my back gitlab
dr|z3d
eyedeekay: blow it off, sounds like now's a great time to replace it with gitea.
eyedeekay
2 weeks before release? Pretty sure I'm not that crazy
eyedeekay
It should not be this hard to get nginx to act as a client to i2pgit.org, then serve it back to the HTTP tunnel on 80
dr|z3d
well, here's an idea. run gitea in parallel for now, see how you get on with it, and then when you're comfortable, switch.
eyedeekay
Might give that a shot yeah
eyedeekay
Just seems very ill-advised to suddenly migrate without a plan
dr|z3d
are you giving nginx the correct SSL cert?
dr|z3d
because nginx can't proxy_pass to https without a cert.
eyedeekay
Even if the cert is in the global store?
eyedeekay
Yeah that's probably it
dr|z3d
you could alternatively proxy_pass to a private port, that's probably easier.
eyedeekay
That's the really hilarious part
eyedeekay
It isn't
eyedeekay
It isn't even close
eyedeekay
No dice on the cert configuration
dr|z3d
ah, right, gotcha, http -> https or vice versa no workee on gitlab.
eyedeekay
It can't even listen on both
eyedeekay
Apparently it's some rails bullshit
dr|z3d
see if this helps: cake.i2p/view/rsZeVhnXcT_Xd1vqegSCWLSpsnM3QwoFLfTncdWoa_i1eLrydsxK/rsZeVhnXcT.txt
dr|z3d
gitlab itself shouldn't be listening on multiple ports, that's nginx's job.
eyedeekay
Technically you're right but it's a little more complicated than that, there's gitlab the API and there's gitlab the webUI and then there all the little working components of it, what it actually does is starts an API server then serves a bunch of files with nginx(the webUI) then uses nginx to proxy them both, so by definition the thing you see is actually an nginx server sitting between you and the API
eyedeekay
server serving you files
eyedeekay
That's an oversimplification actually gitlab's this complicated behemoth
dr|z3d
yeah, it's a monster, this much I know.
eyedeekay
But part of the standard gitlab install is this nginx server which it configures for you
eyedeekay
So on i2pgit.org there's the nginx in the VM where gitlab runs then there's the nginx on the host, the nginx on the host I configure by hand and it has no problems listening on multiple ports
eyedeekay
But for the nginx in the VM when I try to make it listen on a second port it gets all confused
eyedeekay
But that nginx and the nginx on the host both need to be using TLS or gitlab will think it's being served over HTTP and try to get a bunch of stuff over HTTP which will cause it to break ^^
dr|z3d
it seems obvious to me that you're spending way too much time wrestling with it.
eyedeekay
You have a point
dr|z3d
if you like gitlab enough, use their servers.
eyedeekay
I just need it to survive 13 days
eyedeekay
And a plan
eyedeekay
I don't
dr|z3d
I think you can use a custom hostname with their servers.
eyedeekay
I hate gitlab, I've hated it since before we deployed it
eyedeekay
It is among my chief regrets that I didn't fight harder for gitea when the time was right
eyedeekay
As far as I2P decisions
dr|z3d
in your boat, I'd mirror the current repos to gitlab.com (while keeping your servers running)..
dr|z3d
then when everything looks intact, I'd see about using your current domains with their servers. as an interim measure.
dr|z3d
then I'd setup gitea on your vps, and mirror all the repos to it (initially).
dr|z3d
then, when the dust has settled, you can tell gitea not to mirror anymore, you want it to be a "normal" repo. and then you've got gitlab.com and github as backup plans where you can also leverage their CI.
eyedeekay
It's simple enough to add gitlab remotes to the mirror script
dr|z3d
but if you want painless, just run a gitea instance and mirror the repos you want, then you can get a sense of how it functions without disturbing anything.
eyedeekay
and I understand **exactly** how to make gitea honor proxy settings of any level of elaboration, gitlab I don't even bother trying to hide the physical location of the server but with gitea, I could actually achieve that
eyedeekay
Not that we need to or should, but we could
eyedeekay
it's really easy to get gitlab to contact other git servers and really hard to tell when it's following your proxy settings
dr|z3d
gitlab works for me because I let them run it :)
dr|z3d
I suspect I'd hate it as much as you if I was hosting it.
eyedeekay
I dunno
eyedeekay
jgit's easy, gitea's easy
eyedeekay
presumably gogs is still easy
dr|z3d
well, if maintenance gets in the way of doing stuff, then there's a problem, houston!
eyedeekay
It's because I'm running it **and** because it's way too complicated
eyedeekay
Like you can just throw the jgit war into the eepsite config and it works
eyedeekay
is it jgit I'm thinking of
eyedeekay
no it's gitbucket
eyedeekay
gitbucket is based on jgit
eyedeekay
Hey it's only 2:15 and I've finally got it down to just a stupid redirect loop
dr|z3d
haha
dr|z3d
well done
zzz
eyedeekay, what I would give up on is http+https, which I thought you did give up several days ago
zzz
and made the change two days ago
zzz
but took another run at yesterday which seems to have been fruitless?
eyedeekay
What I was trying to do yesterday was just to get comments to post, or at least get it to where I could see why they weren't
eyedeekay
Which was indeed fruitless
eyedeekay
I did get http->https redirects on the I2P side working
zzz
hmph. baby steps
zzz
oooh finally tracked down a good susimail bug
zzz
I'm going to clean it up and get it in, eyedeekay ok if I bump afterward?
eyedeekay
Yeah go right ahead
zzz
susimail is going to be cherry
zzz
I'm almost done with 2.5.0
RN
If you want to test the dev version but don't want to build it youreself you can grab an updater file at I2Peek-a-Boo.i2p/i2pupdates.html 2.3.0-18-rc
dr|z3d
cherry..
dr|z3d
is that cherry with mail filters and multiple user-defined folders flavor of cherry, zzz? :)
dr|z3d
also, I asked postman if there was an issue with mail retention on the server re the online reader (view online, no download).. apparently no issue at all.
dr|z3d
eyedeekay's also interested in getting pgp integration working. would be good to see that happening, perhaps in conjunction with contacts feature, so you can attach a pgp key to a contact and susimail handles the pgp encryption / decryption transparently.
dr|z3d
local disk encryption of the mail store also cherry flavored :)
RN
Brand New Cherry flavor
RN
(ugh that was a creepy movie)
dr|z3d
Cherry wasn't bad.
dr|z3d
Post-Iraq soldier adjusts to civilian life.
RN
don't think that's the same movie
RN
brand new cherry flavor has a character eat their eyeball
RN
not really ontopic. LOL
eyedeekay
Here's a question put after entirely too little consideration IMO...
eyedeekay
What if there was an "EncryptedWorkingDir extends WorkingDir"
eyedeekay
i.e. use a password to unlock the config dir and actually start I2P with the config, treating it as a sort of "profile"
eyedeekay
I've done zero research on it but maybe that's both better and potentially more straightforward than encrypting the susimail data only
zzz
here's my proposed cherries for 2.5, mostly done: stats.i2p/docs/roadmap-2.5-zzz.html
dr|z3d
eyedeekay: sure, works for me. a bit like firefox's optional password storage password.
dr|z3d
looks good, zzz. plenty of time in the next release cycle for additional cherries, then :)
zzz
not really as by the time all that gets in we will probably be close to big changes deadline, aka "merge window"
dr|z3d
you can add another possible cherry there, maybe, your keepalive stuff?
zzz
on there
dr|z3d
I must be blind, then. Can't see it.
dr|z3d
ah, there it is. my bad.
dr|z3d
another thing that was mooted a while back.. blind dests for snark.. any more thoughts on that?
zzz
requires a proposal/spec/postman involvement
zzz
and bigly
dr|z3d
roger that.
dr|z3d
since you've been so busy, here's a gift..
dr|z3d
body {text-align:center;font-family:sans-serif;background:#449;font-size:90%}
dr|z3d
h1,h2,h3{color:#fff}
dr|z3d
h3{margin:30px auto 0;width:50%;min-width:600px;background:#225;box-shadow:0 0 0 5px #225;padding-bottom:8px}
dr|z3d
table,th,td {border:1px solid #ddf;border-collapse:collapse}
dr|z3d
table{margin:auto;width:50%;min-width:600px;box-shadow:0 0 0 1px #ddd,0 0 0 5px #225}
dr|z3d
th, td {padding: 4px 8px;text-align:left}
zzz
re: encryption, seems like a howto writeup for fscrypt would be the thing
dr|z3d
th{font-size:80%}
dr|z3d
th:nth-child(n+2),td:nth-child(n+2) {text-align:center}
dr|z3d
tr:nth-child(even){background:#eef}
dr|z3d
tr:nth-child(odd){background:#fff}
zzz
and where would I use that gift?
dr|z3d
add it as a <style> block on that proposals page you just posted.
dr|z3d
and anywhere else you need to throw up tabulated data.
zzz
just notes but ok
dr|z3d
also, don't be lazy. that html *chuckle*
dr|z3d
you're making RN look good, and that's saying something :)
zzz
next time I'll do text to not awaken the pnut gallery
dr|z3d
:)
dr|z3d
you can nuke this line, not optimal on that table: th:nth-child(n+2), td:nth-child(n+2) { ... }
dr|z3d
left alignment on all cells probably what you want.
dr|z3d
and if you convert the <p> above the table to an <h3> it'll sit nicely.
RN
:P