anonymousmaybe
zzz confirmed, its working
anonymousmaybe
thank you!
zzz
some interesting early results on Java 20 AVX ChaCha
zzz
might be worth doing
zzz
Java 11 non-AVX? probably not
orignal
maybe to switch tunnel encryption to chacha20
orignal
*worth
zzz
even w/ AVX it's only faster for about 1200 bytes or more
zzz
I'm gathering data on what % of chacha calls are 1200+
orignal
a tunnel message in 1K
zzz
w/o AVX the threshold is more like 2500 bytes
zzz
yup
orignal
better to gather data about 1K
zzz
so far, 1K is below the threshold
orignal
what's the difference vs. AES?
zzz
don't know
zzz
just comparing chacha impls
orignal
as I remmebr chaha20 was always faster than AES
orignal
even with AESNI
zzz
you using an AVX implementation for chacha?
orignal
idk what openssl uses
orignal
most likely
orignal
they detect it automatically
zzz
need to retest on a high-bw router but 98% of chacha/poly calls are sizes < 1216
zzz
and would not benefit from java avx
zzz
0 - 63: 49.835213% **************************************************
zzz
64 - 127: 3.9530945% ****
zzz
128 - 191: 5.8486133% ******
zzz
192 - 255: 2.2870045% **
zzz
256 - 319: 0.3550684%
zzz
320 - 383: 0.02185036%
zzz
384 - 447: 0.018208634%
zzz
448 - 511: 0.09650576%
zzz
512 - 575: 0.14748994%
zzz
576 - 639: 0.4424698%
zzz
640 - 703: 0.6901072% *
zzz
704 - 767: 1.1252936% *
zzz
768 - 831: 1.5240628% **
zzz
832 - 895: 1.2873504% *
zzz
896 - 959: 2.6675649% ***
zzz
960 - 1023: 1.6842988% **
zzz
1024 - 1087: 22.238205% **********************
zzz
1088 - 1151: 3.6107721% ****
zzz
1152 - 1215: 0.22396621%
zzz
1216 - 1279: 0.25492087%
zzz
1280 - 1343: 0.6281979% *
zzz
1344 - 1407: 0.56082594% *
zzz
everything higher < 0.1%
Irc2PGuest93188
deb.i2p2.de's cert is expired?
zzz
see instructions on its home page
Irc2PGuest93188
Thanks
zzz
np, it was my screwup, ignored my own reminders, sorry about that :)