IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2023/09/27
RN by the way, the proper fix for java18 javadocs is to change <h4> and </h4> to <H1> and </H1> and that should work the same in java8
mesh really
mesh that's freaking sucks
mesh javadoc wants html tags capitalized?
RN no
RN I messed up the caps
RN but you can't have <H4> if you didn't have <H3> prior
RN so H1 it should be
mesh yeah I was gonna say I use lowercase tags in javadoc.html all the time
RN hehe
RN it took me a couple years to websearch the WHY
RN heheh
RN but now that I'm making dev builds again... I poked my head into the updaterWithJavadocs again
RN (my previous fix was to just delete those tags, but H1 is better)
mesh interesting
mesh has anybody gotten around to building i2p with something newer than java8?
RN I'm assuming earlier java doesn't check as completely
RN yes
mesh RN: very interesting
mesh RN: do you have docs on how you produce jdk18 builds?
RN I have a script... moment...
RN it does more than just build
mesh I need to dig up my previous docs. I think I was close to building i2p with java8 at the beginning of summer, way back in june
RN I'm actually going to switch to building with jdk8 before I make the updates section on my site live
RN for maximum compatibility
mesh jdk8 will never die unfortunately
mesh after humans blow themselves up it'll just be cockroaches and they'll probably use jdk8
RN heheh
zzz eyedeekay, thanks for the approvals and merges... now I have questions :)
eyedeekay zzz pong re: questions
zzz good morning, how goes it?
zzz just some simple process q's
eyedeekay Keeping busy, you?
eyedeekay Go for q's
zzz - we didn't talk about it, but I expected you'd approve my MRs and then I'd merge them... were you just doing me a favor, or are you responsible for all merging?
eyedeekay Didn't have a hard and fast rule but I can do it that way
zzz b/c I may have final tweaks or want to fixup the merge commit msg
zzz but it may depend on the next q too:
zzz - Am I allowed to checkin anything directly to trunk (besides merges), even something minor? Or must everything go thru an MR?
eyedeekay If it's tiny go ahead and add it to trunk, I do the feature-branch thing because it's easier for me to work through the big diffs but if the diff fits in an 80x40 terminal it is probably not worth it
zzz - am I allowed to add entries to history.txt and/or bump the build rev? Or, it appears you're only updating history.txt at release time, is that the new system?
eyedeekay Updating at the end is a bad system I need to get out of the habit of using, feel free to bump history, but ask about build rev
zzz - ok, so I'd like to merge the MR you approved last night, then add that one and all my MRs that you merged to history.txt, and bump to -3, and push that directly. OK?
eyedeekay Sure go ahead
zzz great, that's all my q's for now. If I'm not sure what to classify as 'tiny' in the future I'll ask. Thanks!
eyedeekay You're welcome, np
zzz one more thing eyedeekay, I need your review of my SAM MR in the next couple days because I promised to get back to bitcoin by the end of the month :)
eyedeekay Ack, will have it done today
zzz thanks