+Irc2PGuest51117
+Irc2PGuest90409
+T3s|4
+acetone
+eche|off
+nilbog
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+sourceress
Arch
Danny
Irc2PGuest23180
Irc2PGuest35290
Irc2PGuest36302
Irc2PGuest39635
Irc2PGuest49364
Irc2PGuest6564
Irc2PGuest67278
Irc2PGuest71245
MatrixBot
Onn4l7h
Over
Sleepy
Teeed
Yotsu
_bob_
aargh3
ac9f
ahiru
ananas2
anontor2
b3t4f4c3__
cims_
dr4wd3_
dr|z3d
duanin2
eyedeekay
eyedeekay_
f00b4r
ghirolt
hababam_
leopold
marek
n2_
noidea
not_bob_afk2
nyaa2pguy
o3d3_
profetikla
r00tobo
rapidash
solidx66
stormycloud[m]
test7363673
uop23ip
user_
zelgomer
dr|z3d
another theory, just a theory, regarding flash of white for snark, zzz, is that firefox is treating it as a separate domain on account of the separate cookie and isolating it. haven't researched it, just a theory. I doubt there's anything we can do to have snark share the console cookie?
zzz
dr|z3d, pretty sure it's shared across webapps, you don't have to login separately for each webapp
zzz
and it's shared domain
dr|z3d
you may be right, just a theory. however, when I look at my cookie storage, I see 2 cookies, one for / and one for /susidns
dr|z3d
we also have cookies being set for eepsites via jetty. I vaguely recall trying to turn those off, probably not what we want as default, may dive into it again.
zzz
sure, eepsites are different
dr|z3d
yup, just saying while we were on the subject of cookies. :)
dr|z3d
and we should be ensuring all console/webap cookies are HttpOnly, no?
dr|z3d
here, console is, susidns isn't. but maybe the susidns cookie shouldn't exist.
zzz
we have a whole pile of code in RouterConsoleRunner to ensure all the webapps are on a common auth...
zzz
not sure about separate cookies
zzz
the httponly stuff, and cookies in general, is a huge mess iirc, because the jetty API changed completely from 9.3 to 9.4
zzz
so we'd have to deal with both and have a big debian patch to make it work for both
dr|z3d
yeah, I've always found jetty's cookie management to be less that intuitive, like most of jetty's configuration.
zzz
I've looked at it a couple times and said nah, not worth it
zzz
if firefox clamps down we;ll take another look
orignal
zzz, what's wrong with XU?
orignal
you might have very good bandwidth no ipv4
orignal
*but