@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+orignal
+postman
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest16752
Irc2PGuest33667
Irc2PGuest51880
Irc2PGuest97218
Onn4l7h
Sisyphus
Sleepy_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f_
b3t4f4c3__
b4dab00m
bak83_
duanin2
eyedeekay_
john231
leopold
makoto
nilbog-
not_bob_afk
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
tr
u5657
uop23ip
vivid_reader56
w8rabbit
x74a6
xHarr
RN
is the stat router.integratedPeers the same as displayed "Active Peers?"
obscuratus
RN: No, router.integratedPeers is the same as FloodFills.
RN
hmmm... jsonrpc doesn't agree with console...
RN
and it gives the same value for thoe
RN
those
obscuratus
RN: Are you saying router.integratedPeers is tracking "Active Peers" for your router?
obscuratus
I graph router.activePeers and router.integratedPeers for my router, and they both track with what I expect, with activePeers being what it say, and integratedPeers tracking Floodfills
RN
in the console it is fine, just what I'm getting in conky they are the same number
RN
and what conky shows is closest to active peers in console
RN
double checked a dozen times if I missnamed the function or stat or mistyped it where it is invoked
obscuratus
You've tied conky into I2P. :) Hhhhmmmm. Ok, I'm impressed.
RN
no, idk did that
RN
I'm just tinkering with it
RN
he uses lua to handle i2pcontrol/jsonrpc