@eyedeekay
&zzz
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+dr|z3d
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb1
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
HowardPlayzOfAdmin1
Irc2PGuest14613
Irc2PGuest50191
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest6854
Irc2PGuest8073
Irc2PGuest90809
Leopold
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
SigSegv
Sisyphus
Sleepy_
SlippyJoe
T3s|4_
acetone_
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
boonst
cumlord
death
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
not_bob_afk
onon_
poriori
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
zzz
dr|z3d, obscuratus, proposed patch is up on gitlab
obscuratus
zzz: Thanks, I'll throw it up on my testing network.
dr|z3d
thanks, zzz, will take it for a spin.
dr|z3d
does this negate obscuratus' first LookupDestJob path, or can they be run side-by-side?
dr|z3d
*patch
zzz
the former
dr|z3d
ok, thanks
dr|z3d
patch looks good, zzz. easy way to test is to hit some of the b32 links on notbob, they should resolve immediately.
dr|z3d
(previously hitting a b32 would fail on first attempt)
obscuratus
zzz: The patch is working well so far on my testing network. Examining my logs, I can see the LS hitting the persistent data store much earlier, and the subsequent lookups are all successful.
obscuratus
I haven't found any errors or observable regressions so far.
zzz
thanks guys, I'll probably let it soak another day or two
dr|z3d
speaking of soaking, zzz, git.idk.i2p/i2p-hackers/i2p.i2p/-/merge_requests/49 ? :)
zzz
the zlatinb-proposed test regimen kinda squashed it
dr|z3d
oh :(