@eyedeekay
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+altonen
+dr|z3d
+hk
+lbt
+orignal
+postman
+radakayot
+snex
+weko
+wodencafe
Arch
BravoOreo
Dann
FreeB
FreefallHeavens_
Irc2PGuest11045
Irc2PGuest27999
Irc2PGuest28584
Irc2PGuest3338
Irc2PGuest59134
Irc2PGuest82579
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Sleepy_
Soni
T3s|4_
Teeed_
aeiou_
aisle1
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83
dickless
dr4wd3
enoxa
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
not_bob_afk
phil
plap
poriori_
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
solidx66_
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6h
SilicaRice
what prevents someone from leaking an encrypted LS?
dr|z3d
SilicaRice: nothing.
dr|z3d
what prevents someone from leaking a private ssh key?
SilicaRice
ohh
SilicaRice
so a combination of "friendship keys" (revokable per-client destination) with encrypted LS (revokable per-client leaseset) would be the ideal DDoS protection then, on the assumption that all clients are known?
dr|z3d
depends on your threat model. "ideal" is a movable feast.
SilicaRice
a malicious client could leak the leaseset, at which point you just nuke the destination. all the other clients would still be able to connect normally but any DDoSers wouldn't.