IRCaBot 2.1.0
GPLv3 © acetone, 2021-2022
#i2p-dev
/2022/05/20
@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&kytv
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+hk
+orignal
+postman
+weko
+wodencafe
An0nm0n
Arch
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest21357
Irc2PGuest21881
Leopold_
Nausicaa
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Over1
Sisyphus
Sleepy
Soni
T3s|4_
aargh2
anon2
b3t4f4c3
bak83
boonst
cancername
cumlord
dr4wd3
eyedeekay_bnc
hagen_
khb
mareki2p
not_bob_afk
plap
poriori
profetikla
r3med1tz-
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
tr
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
zlatinb eyedeekay: re GPLv2+CE compliance
zlatinb I'm doing something very different from you in the Mac bundle
zlatinb we should go over what approach is the correct one, or if both are ok
eyedeekay I see your last change was to bundle all the licenses from i2p.i2p into the Resources directory, I want to double check that I get all that installed with NSIS
eyedeekay But I'm not quite sure what we are doing very differently otherwise?
zlatinb afaik you're generating an License-index file, whereas I'm just copy-pasting the LICENSE.txt from i2p.i2p
zlatinb and then cat >> to it a blurb about GPLv2+CE (see previous commit)
zlatinb the assumption being that zzz has done his homework on license compliance in the LICENSE.txt file and it's ok to just build on top that lol
zlatinb also wrt maintainability it's better to rely on a single source of truth so to speak
zzz eyedeekay, re: SAM exception - if you have questions about code, this is a good place to ask, before you check in changes
zzz putting speculation and ponderings into check comments is neither good practice nor a good look for the project
zzz translators: console news release announcement entry pushed to transifex, please translate by Noon UTC Monday
eyedeekay Ack. I guess my only question is whether there is another way which would have worked? I tried re-creating SAMException on the Android app in a scope I could use it, but it didn't work
eyedeekay zlatinb: I see... LICENSE.index is mostly there to be picked up by NSIS, since NSIS shows one license page by default the purpose of concatenating them is to make sure all licenses show up in the NSIS license page
eyedeekay Individual license files for bundled software(the files that get combined) are also installed by the installer
zzz eyedeekay, no, that's the correct change, it's the speculation that was wrong. It wasn't public before because it was never thrown from a public class, afaik, it was internal only
zzz there's nothing wrong with public methods in a package private class, it wasn't a bug, it's just that it wasn't part of the public API before
zzz so let's make changes based on solid understanding, not add checkin comments that make it look like we're flailing coder hacks around here :)
eyedeekay Thanks for helping clarify that for me. I guess I got the right answer, but with like 25% right reasoning. Good thing I'm making progress in TIJ
eyedeekay OK I've got some improvements to the licensing stuff inbound, should make it much less confusing, there were a few issues I hadn't identified with it until I went through it all end-to-end today, nothing huge but I'll document it in the release section of the readme
zzz dr|z3d, no