&eche|on
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+StormyCloud
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+eche|off
+not_bob_afk
+orignal
+postman
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
FreefallHeavens
Irc2PGuest16752
Irc2PGuest33667
Irc2PGuest51880
Onn4l7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy_
Teeed
aargh2
ac9f_
b3t4f4c3__
b4dab00m
bak83_
duanin2
duck
john231
leopold
makoto
mareki2p_
nilbog-
poriori_
profetik1
r00tobo
rapidash
shiver_
solidx66
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
vivid_reader56
x74a6
xHarr
zlatinb
interesting thought: reddit.com/r/i2p/comments/ued46f/inproxy_or_connecting_to_i2p_proxy_from_a_remote ( ACLs for tunnels & console )
eche|on
i2p does not need inbound tunnels, it works better, but does not ultimately needs them
zzz
what does ACL mean in this context? IP/port restrictions?
zlatinb
yes I think so
zzz
as opposed to OS-level firewall rules then?
zlatinb
I guess
mesh
yeah you're better off with ssh port forwarding
mesh
you should never expose such an important web app to non-localhost interfaces
mesh
but I understand where the poster is coming from. the i2p router should essentially have ssh port forwarding capability built in
mesh
though in reality what you'd want is something like a ssp/vpn-type solution.