@eyedeekay
&zzz
+FreefallHeavens
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+cumlord
+eche|off
+mareki2p
+orignal
+postman
+qend-irc2p
+robin
+snex
+wodencafe
Arch
BubbRubb
Chrono
Danny
DeltaOreo
HowardPlayzOfAdmin
Irc2PGuest14159
Irc2PGuest28800
Irc2PGuest93285
Onn4l7h
Over
Sisyphus
Sleepy
SlippyJoe
Stormycloud_
T3s|4_
Teeed
ac9f
acetone__
ardu
b3t4f4c3__
bak83_
coolbuddy799
dr4wd3
dr|z3d
duanin2
duck
eyedeekay_bnc
kaffi
leopold_
makoto
marek22k
nilbog
not_bob_afk
poriori
pory
profetikla
r00tobo_BNC
rapidash
shiver_
thetia
u5657
uop23ip
w8rabbit
x74a6
zlatinb
interesting thought: reddit.com/r/i2p/comments/ued46f/inproxy_or_connecting_to_i2p_proxy_from_a_remote ( ACLs for tunnels & console )
eche|on
i2p does not need inbound tunnels, it works better, but does not ultimately needs them
zzz
what does ACL mean in this context? IP/port restrictions?
zlatinb
yes I think so
zzz
as opposed to OS-level firewall rules then?
zlatinb
I guess
mesh
yeah you're better off with ssh port forwarding
mesh
you should never expose such an important web app to non-localhost interfaces
mesh
but I understand where the poster is coming from. the i2p router should essentially have ssh port forwarding capability built in
mesh
though in reality what you'd want is something like a ssp/vpn-type solution.