orignal
released
dr|z3d
you know as soon as you've got a new version committed, someone's bound to build and run it :)
orignal
I know
orignal
guys like to build trunk
dr|z3d
orignal:
dr|z3d
WARN [...Handler 3/8] ...ool.BuildHandler: Dropping hostile tunnel request -> Previous and next hop are the same
dr|z3d
* Router: [BpATV4]
dr|z3d
* Layer Key: SVDEuxhYWSdVXg5ZiKzPEZOdKaRhTgkllloRvs4bn-s=
dr|z3d
* IV Key: CiEMAHXdfa3U4R9Xcswldk~OyPb7Sum7qrYtJze8nZ8=
dr|z3d
* Reply Key: 5~eSkuIop848UKfmEVvnupE~lusE78zEh6S-9Nv6og4=
dr|z3d
* Reply IV: CK3lX4bGzZpqHZ83EIMZPw==
dr|z3d
router is one of yours (mail.i2pd.xyz)
dr|z3d
smells like a bug.
orignal
it's R4SAS's
orignal
it's not a bug
orignal
just not implemneted ))
orignal
tunnels like A->B->A are possible
dr|z3d
yeah, smells like a bug to me :)
dr|z3d
call it unimplemented if you like.
dr|z3d
it's categorized as hostile in any event. shouldn't be happening.
orignal
well it's not even unimplemneted
orignal
we consider it as feature
orignal
like such situation is not impossible
dr|z3d
highly undesirable. that's why it's marked as hostile in java i2p, and treated accordingly.
dr|z3d
want to request duplicate hops? fine, I'll ban you.
dr|z3d
(is how I2P+ handles hostile requests)
orignal
I don't request duplicate hops next to each other
orignal
only through intermediate
orignal
sure you can ban me
dr|z3d
any hostile tunnel requests get the router a short term ban.
orignal
as I said no problem
dr|z3d
would prefer not to ban at all.
orignal
let me think. maybe I will implement it later
orignal
it was some issue with it
dr|z3d
ok, thanks
dr|z3d
build success 96% on one router right now. read and weep, orignal! ;)
weko
With banned half of network I guess?
dr|z3d
hardly, weko.
weko
It is less anonymously, you just sell anonymous level for tcsr. Not for respect, my opinion.
dr|z3d
the objective isn't to boost build success, that's just a side effect of avoiding shitty routers.
weko
I understand
weko
It is what about I said
dr|z3d
and unless you're running as a floodfill, the ban rate is pretty low relative to the size of the network.
weko
Are you sure about "shit router" level?
dr|z3d
I'm happy enough. Mostly shit routers fall into the category of floodfills with SSU disabled.
weko
So, I suggest add "anonymous level" which will be setup "shit" level for profiling. So, it is ideal, give users setup witch balance of anonymity/quality they want have.
weko
which*
weko
dr|z3d: why disabled SSU mean shitty? i2pd removed ssu at all, for example. Maybe you meant SSU2?
dr|z3d
not needed. like I said, the ratio of bans to known peers is low enough.
dr|z3d
advanced users already have a bunch of configs they can tweak to get the result they want.
dr|z3d
no, I mean SSU, the protocol, not SSU the version.
weko
Oh, okay. Idk why it mean shit for you, but okay then if any version
dr|z3d
ok, I'll tell you. 4000+ ffs in the netdb with ssu disabled is why it means shit to me.
weko
[20:52:14] <dr|z3d> not needed. like I said, the ratio of bans to known peers is low enough.
weko
[20:52:14] <dr|z3d> advanced users already have a bunch of configs they can tweak to get the result they want.
weko
So, okay, just idea for ideal realization. Not so useful for make it firstly, ofc.
dr|z3d
I try and offer configuration options where they make sense.