@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+acetone
+not_bob
+orignal
+weko
Irc2PGuest21083
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
aargh2
anon4
cancername
eyedeekay_bnc
hk
profetikla
shiver_
u5657
x74a6
zzz
orignal, will non-ff i2pd respond to RI database lookup messages?
orignal
good question
orignal
I have to check
zzz
yeah, remember the discussion of 'push' vs 'pull' of RI for connected peers, and we implemented push?
zzz
I implemented pull also but didn't seem to work well
orignal
it doesn't check if we are floodfill
orignal
it replies as usual
zzz
hmm
zzz
thanks, will keep investigating
dr|z3d
ok, here we go again with another part tunnel spike.
orignal
I'm pretty sure it's retroshare through Bob
orignal
another question
orignal
do we allow floodfill be an instroducer in SSU2?
orignal
because we don't in SSU1
zzz
that's a policy/implementation question, not a protocol question, but for me, the issues are the same for SSU 1 and 2: trying to minimize floodfill connections
orignal
my question is very practical
orignal
should I send relay request block to FF?
orignal
*relya tag request
dr|z3d
zzz is saying "no" in a roundabout way, orignal. best to minimize non-floodfill traffic to floodfills. but it's your choice.
zzz
if it is advertised as an introducer, then yes, it agreed, so why not?
orignal
if I'm a floodfill should I accept or not?
zzz
if you gave out a relay tag, you should honor it
zzz
if you don't want to be an introducer, don't hand out tags
orignal
when I receive relay tag request
orignal
bascially I don't care
orignal
just want to implement it identical way
zzz
you don't have to do it the same. If you don't have a problem with floodfill connection limits, then hand out tags, the more the better
dr|z3d
ok, spike time here we come again..
zzz
data is filling in nicely on my fancy new chart: stats.i2p/cgi-bin/parttunnels-day.cgi
dr|z3d
yeah, looking good there, zzz. load ramps the higher the bandwidth share, with everything from M up getting hit.
zzz
this chart might be the clearest/cleanest picture stats.i2p/cgi-bin/leasesets-week.cgi
dr|z3d
from that graph, the trend is ever upwards. doesn't look like there's any risk of it calming down in the immediate future.
zzz
orignal, R4SAS, has anybody asked this guy to stop?
zzz
never mind, I just did
dr|z3d
oh, you know who it is?
orignal
what guy?
dr|z3d
if it's retroshare + BOB causing the issue, isn't there a newer retroshare that now uses SAM?
orignal
we have fixed this issue even in i2pd
orignal
newer retorshare uses SAM
orignal
and SOCKS + inbound tunnel works even better