@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+orignal
FreeRider
Irc2PGuest15271
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
aargh3
acetone_
anon4
cancername
eyedeekay_bnc
not_bob_afk
profetikla
shiver_1
u5657
weko_
x74a6
eyedeekay
So this is pretty uncool:
eyedeekay
I think we should try to appeal to stewards-p2p@wikimedia.org on behalf of our users, it looks like they're banning every IP address that they can enumerate, or whoever is providing them with their list
eyedeekay
So I'm going to draft an email
eyedeekay
It looks like if you're not firewalled, you end up on this list
zzz
orignal, R4SAS, the crash problem was that it trying to decode the "i" value in SSU? if we change it to "k" would that prevent the crashes?
R4SAS
zzz: hm, I dont remember
R4SAS
if I correctly understand, SSU2 value was unexpected
R4SAS
zzz: ^
zzz
right, so if we change it to "k" will that prevent the crash?
orignal
zzz, older version assumed that i can appear for NTCP2 only
orignal
no, leave as "i"
orignal
it's fine
orignal
not only "i" but also "s"
zzz
can we change them to prevent the crashes?
orignal
why should we?
orignal
2.41 is fine
orignal
nobody cares about older versions
orignal
and alomost everybody has upgraded
orignal
I have another question
orignal
does you SSU2 support ipv6 now?
zzz
by my measurements only about 45-60% of i2pd routers have updated
zzz
re: ipv6, all my testnet testing is on ipv6. I actually have only tested ipv4 in standalone test code
orignal
I mean one in main network
orignal
then let thm crash
orignal
or ypu have another option
orignal
publish SSU2 rather than SSU
zzz
I can't do SSU2, unfortunately.
zzz
so we can either rename i and s, or let them crash
zzz
you want to crash them, ok
orignal
let them crash then
zzz
ok, probably later today
orignal
and I will start publishing SSU2
orignal
probably with caps="6"
orignal
for the beginning
orignal
or if you run it as non-FF it affects less
zzz
right, disabled ff a week ago
zlatinb
eyedeekay: my home routers are firewalled and I can still browse wikipedia
zlatinb
pls collect as much evidence as you can, we can get TF to write about this if it's real
Xeha
the complaint was about being a editor on wikimedia projects
zlatinb
oh, well then I can't check
Xeha
i checked a few of mines where i2pd runs, all negative (ie not blocked)
zlatinb
are they firewalled or OK ?
Xeha
of course they arent firewalled :) thats the point of FFs
zzz
zlatinb, I've been testing with the reduced tunnel build expiration for a week, no issues
zlatinb
cool
zzz
where do you want to go from here?
zlatinb
what values did you test with?
zzz
+ static final int REQUEST_TIMEOUT = SystemVersion.isSlow() ? 10*1000 : 5*1000;
zzz
+ private static final int LOOP_TIME = SystemVersion.isSlow() ? 1000 : 800;
zlatinb
800? I thought you wanted 500
zzz
not iirc
zlatinb
I'm happy for this to be committed. I won't be able to test with MuWire until it goes into Maven but I can test initial startup times locally
zzz
ok, I'll push it
zlatinb
and as a separate exercise we'll have to ask echelon to install linux on his M1 so we can distinguish that as not slow
zzz
isSlow() will still return true until we have jbigi for it
zlatinb
we have jbigi for aarch64
zlatinb
linux-aarch64*
zzz
oh, linux, yeah
zlatinb
macos-aarch64 isn't a thing yet unless the user builds manually
zzz
just need somebody to do it
zlatinb
I was looking at buying an M1 yesterday but decided to wait at least until vmware comes with a hypervisor for it
zlatinb
I don't like the idea of dual-booting
zlatinb
the mac mini is the cheapest option for getting an M1 even if its usability is limited
eyedeekay
I'm working on figuring out what it is, so far about half of the routers I've tested have been in the list for one reason or another
eyedeekay
Of my routers 4/5 that I've checked have been in the blocklist
eyedeekay
I'm going to test against a big sample of router IP addresses and try and determine statistically if we need to be very concerned
eyedeekay
so far, Of the 304 IP addresses I tested, 136 were banned
zzz
at least 3 SSU2 routers on live net, no issues so far
eyedeekay
Still asking a few others to check if their peers are banned from Wikipedia but I'm pretty convinced their "API Partners" are recommending they ban I2P routers and providing them with a way to query a pre-enumerated list
eyedeekay
I think the list will turn out to be of limited reliability, but possibly in a consistent way.
eyedeekay
If I am right one point of evidence should be that the fraction of known peers who are banned should be about the same
R4SAS
eyedeekay: who operates i2pmail.org gateway
R4SAS
?
eyedeekay
postman, I don't know who postman is but that's who to reach out to AFAIK
R4SAS
ok, I wrote issue on @mail.i2p, let's see if anyone response
R4SAS
#mail.i2p ***
R4SAS
))