@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+RN_
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+acetone
+orignal
+weko
Irc2PGuest58867
Leopold_
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
T3s|4__
aargh2
anon2
cancername
eyedeekay_bnc
hk
not_bob_afk
profetikla
shiver_
u5657
x74a6
zzz
zlatinb, you have any time for some testnet testing in, say, the next week?
zlatinb
zzz: sure, what do you have in mind?
zzz
getting to the bottom of our instability issues
zlatinb
good
zlatinb
is it what I think it is or something organic?
zzz
too much part. tunnel traffic is getting through the synthetic red queue and it's blowing up the downstream bw limiter, udp, and ntcp
zzz
so we're going to need tests with bw limits, before and after the fixes
zlatinb
and why would this start happening now vs few versions ago?
zlatinb
because ssu fixes?
zzz
the synth. red queue went in a year ago, but my theory is that everything is getting faster, and that's exposing longstanding issues
zlatinb
hmm
zlatinb
it's no problem to test it, but my opinion is there's some drama going on with .ru routers
zzz
thats certainly possible but its an independent issue
zzz
my sybil caught 30 routers on one ru IP about 10 days ago
zzz
non-ff
zzz
sybil only checks ff by default, we could turn it on for non-ff also but I need to try to guess how much memory that would use
zzz
as there's a O(n**2) distance check in there
zzz
so might need to do it only if enough memory