@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+Xeha
+acetone
+orignal
+weko
Hikari
Irc2PGuest67835
Irc2PGuest97144
Leopold
Minogami
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
T3s|4_
anon4
eyedeekay_bnc
idk
j6
not_bob_afk
profetikla
qend-irc2p
u5657
x74a6
zer0bitz
orignal
back to vanity miner
orignal
implemented for opencl
orignal
if anybody is interested let me know
orignal
our release will be major
orignal
because no more SSU
dr|z3d
got a new curious console bug, zzz. looks like a hard limit in jetty's form processing function. cake.i2p/view/vrKmHN7Ezz_QqkqCoyiadsxM6vzrBjYyGSsr2fo6F_yaRxtZbxZM/vrKmHN7Ezz.txt
dr|z3d
possible mitigation would be to only submit changed fields, dunno?
dr|z3d
or maybe it just doesn't like large forms.
dr|z3d
possible fix: programmersought.com/article/62675746662
zzz
I only see 8 form items per tunnel, plus one hidden for 9, so that would support 111 tunnels for a limit of 1000, unless you've done some hacking
dr|z3d
no hacking, just testing hosting limits.
zzz
ok, so you found the limit
zzz
speaking of limits, I have a favor to ask
zzz
would you please change your ParticipatingThrottler limits to be as strict as those in canon?
zzz
as we worked out with obscuratus
zzz
so yours and stormy's routers aren't part of the problem
dr|z3d
not really, I've just found the limit for the form submission :)
dr|z3d
elsewise, doesn't appear to impact anything.
orignal
what are you talking about?
zzz
java-specific stuff probably better in #i2p-dev next time dr|z3d
zzz
java stuff orignal
dr|z3d
re -dev, sure. my bad.
orignal
I thought the oriblem with number of tunnels
dr|z3d
as for throttler limits, they're now at around 20 requests in 220s, so shouldn't be part of the problem.
zzz
to -dev for this one
dr|z3d
or you think that's too high? it's catching a chunk of offending routers.
orignal
too small
orignal
I would limit to like 2 or 5 per second
dr|z3d
yeah, but are you doing any limiting, orignal? :)
orignal
not for participation
orignal
only by number and bandwidth
dr|z3d
might be time to consider some sort of request throttle given the ongoing network issues.
orignal
maybe
orignal
like 500 per minute
dr|z3d
500 per minute? that's an insane amount.
zzz
not really, that's 5000 tunnel requests per 10 minutes
orignal
5K per 10 mintes is fine
orignal
in my opinion
dr|z3d
then I'm confused. we're currently allowing somewhere in the region of 20 requests per 220 seconds, in I2P+, and similar in I2P.
dr|z3d
that's per router, not total.
orignal
ofc I meant total
dr|z3d
I think we do some throttling of total requests if they ramp too quick, but the issue we've currently got is not very many routers on the network making a ridiculous number of requests in a short period, which appears to be impacting overall net perf.
orignal
if I'm a router and produce bunch of requests
orignal
they would go trough different paths
dr|z3d
well, you'd hope so.
dr|z3d
and if a router decides it wants you to handle a huge number of requests, then it should politely (or impolitely) told to take its business elsewhere.
orignal
it's worthless to limit per router
orignal
because they would come from different
dr|z3d
yup, that's true. but you're still able to throttle any router that's making excessive requests, regardless of where those requests originate. which isn't a bad thing.
dr|z3d
and with the throttle calibrated correctly, you won't be throttling much.
zzz
peer test corner case FYI - my bug -
zzz
I was alice, connected to bob for 3 hours, started a peer test with bob
zzz
but my temporary IPv6 address had changed an hour before. My IPv6 address for the session with bob was now deprecated
zzz
I tested my old deprecated address, not my new one, so results came back SNAT
zzz
hopefully fixed
orignal
you mean one in your RI?
orignal
how it's possible?
orignal
if you keep connecting
orignal
in mean time 850 Mh on RX580
zzz
deprecated addresses are still good for a week on linux
zzz
so there was no path migration