@eyedeekay
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+acetone
+orignal
+polistern
+weko
Irc2PGuest50421
Irc2PGuest77041
Leopold
Minogami
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
ProRu
T3s|4_
anon1
eyedeekay_bnc
profetik1
qend-irc2p
x74a6
y2kboy23
zer0bitz
orignal
another problem
orignal
I try peer test for router with unpublished SSU2 address
orignal
and Charlie returns 70
orignal
the router is CEFn
orignal
I don't think 70 is right code in this case
zzz
re: peer test 7, yes I put an address block in there
orignal
it's not mentioned in the specs
orignal
that it must be presented in 7
orignal
so I think the code should we 65 or even another one
zzz
yes it is:
zzz
Payload
zzz
DateTime block
zzz
Address block (required for messages 6 and 7, see note below)
zzz
Peer Test block
zzz
Padding block (optional)
orignal
thanks
orignal
hence why do accept my 6 and 7?
orignal
since I don't send address block
zzz
I don't think I check it yet
orignal
also please explain when I set status to OK
orignal
after 5 or after 7?
orignal
we are testing mode with SSU2 and without SSU
zzz
I don't declare test successful unless I get both 5 and 7. That's the same as for SSU 1.
zzz
but it's a good point
zzz
maybe we could stop after #5
orignal
I receive 4 and 5, but 6 or 7 got lost
orignal
and I remain in Firewalled state
orignal
while it's defintly OK
zzz
I would classify the result as UNKNOWN and schedule another test
zzz
here's from the SSU 1 spec:
zzz
If Alice receives Bob's PeerTest message and both of Charlie's PeerTest messages but the enclosed IP and port numbers in Bob's and Charlie's second messages don't match, she knows that she is behind a symmetric NAT, rewriting all of her outbound packets with different 'from' ports for each peer contacted. She will need to explicitly forward a port and always have that port exposed for remote connectivity, ignoring
zzz
further port discovery.
zzz
so message 7 is used to check for symmetric NAT
orignal
yes I know what 7 is for
orignal
so what with code 70 instead 65?
zzz
70 is more like a RI problem. 65 is a IP/port problem
zzz
but doesn't really matter to me
zzz
I'm getting a whole bunch of: PeerTestManager: Too skewed for msg 2
zzz
I just drop them
zzz
not sure who the alice is, I need to change my logging
orignal
so what would you send if there is SSU2 address but without IP/port?
orignal
what does Too skewed mean?
zzz
clock skew of the timestamp in the peer test block
orignal
for how much
orignal
?
zzz
don't know yet, just changed the logging
zzz
I got 17 of them in an hour, but nothing in last two hours
orignal
are you charlie or bob?
zzz
charlie. message 2.
orignal
it expains
orignal
I bet Bob is i2pd
orignal
I don't check timestamps in SSU2 yet
orignal
so Alice can connect to Bob
orignal
and Bob to Charlie
orignal
but peer test contains Alice's timestamp
orignal
back to the question about unpublished address
orignal
I believe we still can send msg 5
orignal
because we have endpoint in peer test and s and i from RI
zzz
who has an unpublished address? alice or charlie?
orignal
alice
orignal
and send peer test
orignal
in my case charlie responded with 70
orignal
but in my opinion msg 5 should go through
zzz
if charlie responded 70, he either didn't get RI or couldn't find i
orignal
but Bob was 2RRY
orignal
e.g. my router
zzz
charlie was java?
orignal
<orignal> the router is CEFn
orignal
didn't check
orignal
however the question is more common
orignal
what is right behaviour?
orignal
probably I know why 70
orignal
and will fix it
zzz
I was wrong, I send a 65 if I can't find i, not a 70
orignal
probablly that's my bug on Charlie side
orignal
but do you send 65 in this case or let 5 go through?
zzz
if I can't find i, I have to reject, because I can't encrypt 5
orignal
you can
orignal
you find this address in RI