@eyedeekay
&eche|on
&zzz
+R4SAS
+RN
+T3s|4
+acetone
+dr|z3d
+orignal
+postman
+weko
+wodencafe
An0nm0n
Arch
FreefallHeavens
Gid
Hidenet
Irc2PGuest19856
Irc2PGuest2827392
Irc2PGuest39199
Irc2PGuest66831
Irc2PGuest79172
Irc2PGuest82173
Minogami
Onn4l7h
Onn4|7h
Palimpsest
ProRu
Sleepy
SoniEx2
Teeed
aargh4
admin
anon3
b3t4f4c3__
cheddah
eyedeekay_bnc
itsjustme_
j6
limak
not_bob_afk
profetikla
qend-irc2p
rapidash
tbqdrn
theglitch
w8rabbit
x74a6
zer0bitz
zzz
dr|z3d, obscuratus, proposed patch is up on gitlab
obscuratus
zzz: Thanks, I'll throw it up on my testing network.
dr|z3d
thanks, zzz, will take it for a spin.
dr|z3d
does this negate obscuratus' first LookupDestJob path, or can they be run side-by-side?
dr|z3d
*patch
zzz
the former
dr|z3d
ok, thanks
dr|z3d
patch looks good, zzz. easy way to test is to hit some of the b32 links on notbob, they should resolve immediately.
dr|z3d
(previously hitting a b32 would fail on first attempt)
obscuratus
zzz: The patch is working well so far on my testing network. Examining my logs, I can see the LS hitting the persistent data store much earlier, and the subsequent lookups are all successful.
obscuratus
I haven't found any errors or observable regressions so far.
zzz
thanks guys, I'll probably let it soak another day or two
dr|z3d
speaking of soaking, zzz, git.idk.i2p/i2p-hackers/i2p.i2p/-/merge_requests/49 ? :)
zzz
the zlatinb-proposed test regimen kinda squashed it
dr|z3d
oh :(